Linguistic Means and Author’s Intentions
The article examines the author’s particular technique of creating a textual network that would maximally reflect the intention of presenting the model of “an aggressive and inert world from which it is practically impossible to escape”. A peculiarity of the linguistic organization of F. Iskander’s text is the apparent lexical and syntactic redundancy, the abundance of repetitions of various kinds, which seem to slow down the narrative, give the text a particular monotonous and leisurely rhythm, a kind of going round in circles, but the attempt to reduce the text fragment even slightly inevitably leads to a significant loss of meaning
In addition to organizing the integrity and coherence of the text, repetitions perform the following test functions: highlighting the key words that represent the main components of the author’s artistic image of the world (the key lexemes of the text acquire new meanings in multiple repetitions); forming semantic densifications that do not represent the density of events, but only the density of the text; creating and updating false antitheses, including multiple instances of introducing modus indicators (on the one hand / on the other hand, etc.), as well as a special kind of form. The real absence of opposing positions, the meaninglessness of seemingly differently directed actions, the absence of any internal movement make the text practically hermetically closed.
Arnold I. V. Leksiko-semanticheskoe pole v yazyke i tematicheskaya setka teksta [Lexical-semantic field in language and thematic grid of text]. In: Tekst kak obekt kompleksnogo analiza v vuze [Text as an object of complex analysis in higher education]. Leningrad, 1984, pp. 3–11. (in Russ.)
Galperin I. R. Tekst kak ob"ekt lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya [Text as an object of linguistic research]. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007, 144 p. (in Russ.)
Iskander F. Idei i priemy. Plastichnost' prozy: Vstrecha za “kruglym stolom” [Ideas and techniques. Plasticity of prose: Round table meeting]. Voprosy literatury, 1968, no. 9, pp. 51–58. (in Russ.)
Jakobson R. O. Grammaticheskii parallelizm i ego russkie aspekty [Gram-matical parallelism and its Russian aspects]. In: Lakobson R. O. Raboty po poetike [Works on poetics]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1987, pp. 99–132. (in Russ.)
Kupina N. A. Smysl khudozhestvennogo teksta i aspekty lingvo-smyslovogo analiza [The meaning of a artistic text and aspects of linguosemantic analysis]. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State Uni. Press, 1983, 160 p. (in Russ.)
Novikov A. I. Tekst i ego smyslovye dominanty [Text and its semantic dominants]. Eds. N. V. Vasileva, N. M. Nesterova, N. P. Peshkova. Moscow, Institute of Linguistic RAS Publ., 2007, 224 p. (in Russ.)
Otkupshchikova M. I. Sintaksis svyaznogo teksta [Syntax of connected text]. Leningrad, Leningrad State Uni. Press, 1982, 104 p. (in Russ.)
Tripolskaya T. A. DONOS kak skvoznoi rechevoi zhanr v kommunikativnom pole romana V. Grossmana “Zhizn' i sud'ba” [Denunciation as a cross-cutting speech genre in the communicative aspect of the novel “Life and Fate” by V. Grossman]. In: Yazykovaya lichnost': Aspekty izucheniya [Linguistic identity: Aspects of Study]. In memory of Yu. N. Karaulov, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, MAKSPRESS, 2017, pp. 308–321. (in Russ.)
Vygon N. S. Energiya mifa: filosofskaya skazka F. Iskandera “Kroliki i udavy” [The Energy of Myth: F. Iskander’s philosophical tale “Rabbits and Boas”]. Nauka i shkola, 2012, no. 6, pp. 76–79. (in Russ.)
Zubova L. V. Poeziya Mariny Tsvetaevoi. Lingvisticheskii aspekt [Poetry of Marina Tsvetaeva. Linguistic aspect]. Leningrad, Leningrad State Uni. Press, 1989, 262 p. (in Russ.)
Linguistic Means and Author’s Intentions
// Критика и семиотика. 2024. № 2. Pp. 30–46. DOI: 10.25205/2307-1753-2024-2-30-46.