Critical analysis of the ternary opposition epos-epopee-epic class
in the Soviet and post-Soviet literary criticism

Critical analysis of the ternary opposition epos-epopee-epic class
in the Soviet and post-Soviet literary criticism
Авторы (текстом)
T. S. Simyan
Yerevan State University, Faculty of foreign Literature
Keywords
epos, epopee, epic class, epics, literary class, genres, types, history methodology of the humanities, history of the Soviet and post-Soviet literary science
Abstract

The article is an attempt to analyze the key concepts of «epic»,
«epopee» and «epic class». The presented analysis reveals the ambiguity of perception
of these concepts in the Soviet and post-Soviet literary works. Description
of this this problem is given in the «central» texts (encyclopedia, literary
encyclopedia, literary dictionaries, textbooks, and so on) of Soviet literary criticism.
In the course of the analysis of the theoretical and educational literature,
the «sources» (German idealist philosophy, «Russian imitators») of conceptual
«noise» (in the semiotic sense) are identified that have influenced and still partly
govern as stereotypes the understanding of these concepts in the post-Soviet
Russian-language literary thought.
The confusion was that (mostly) «epopee» and «epic» were perceived
as completely different concepts. Polysemy was also connected with the concepts
of «epic» and the drama as a genre and class signifier.
There was no clear line of demarcation between the concepts of «literary
class» and «genre», as it was not perceived and accentuated in the Soviet literary
criticism. «Sources» of the confusion in the Soviet literary criticism were the
German philosophers of the XIX century (Schelling, Hegel, etc.) as well as their
«Russian epigones» (Belinsky).

Bibliography

Ambarcumyan Hayk. Principi i osobennnosti sozdanya motivnogo
ukazatelya armyanskogo eposa «David Sasunskij» [Principles and particulars of
creation motif indicator of Armenian epos “David Sasunskiy”] // Armyanskij
epos i vsemirnoe epicheskoe nasledie [Armenian world epos inheritance]. Yerevan:
Nauka, 2012.

Ambarcumyan Hayk. Tipologicjeskie gruppi armyanskogo eposa «David
Sasunskij»: opit sistematizacii [Typological groups of Armenian epos “David
Sasunskiy” an attempt of systematization] // Epos narodow Evropi e Azii.
Ot sujetnogo ukazatelya k tekstu: metodologiya i praktika sismatizacii
folklornogo naslediya 5–7 noyabrya 2013 (Materiali mejdunarodnoj konferencii)
[Epos of peoples of Europe and Asia. From the plot indicator to the text:
methodology and practice of systematizing folk inheritance 5–7 november 2013
(Materials of international conference)]. M.: RAN IMLI im. A. M. Gor’kogo,
2013.

Aristotle. Sochineniya [Works in four volumes] v 4 tomax. Tom 4. M.: Misl,
1984.

Asmus V. Voprosi teorii estetiki (sbornik statej) [Questions of the theory of
esthetics .Collected works]. M.: Iskusstvo, 1968.

Belinskij V. G. Polnoe sobranie sochinenij: V 13 tomax. Tom 5 [Complete
set of works in 13 volumes. Volume 5]. M.: Izd-vo akademii nauk SSSR, 1954.

Chalizev V. E. Teorriya literature: Uchebnik. 4-e izd. isp. i dop. [Theory of
literature. Study book the fourth issue]. M., 2005.

Dal‘. V. Tolkovij slovar‘ jivogo velikorusskogo yazika [The Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian Language]. M.: Russkij yazik, 1980.

Davydova T. T., Pronin V. A. Teoriiya literatury [Theory of literature]. M.:
Logos, 2003.

Frejdenberg O. M. Poetika syujeta i janra [Poetics of the plot and genre].
M.: Labirint, 1997.

Hegel. Estetika v 4-x tomax [Esthetics in four volumes]. Tom 3. M.: Nauka,
1971.

Zhirmunskij V. Sravnitel’noe literaturovedeniye: Wostok i Zapad [Comparative
literary studies: East and West]. Leningrad: Nauka, 1979.

Jrbashyan Eduard, Machschanyan Henrik. Literaturowedcheskij slovar‘
[Literature dictionary]. Yerevan: Luys, 1972.

Jrbashyan Eduard. Teoriya literaturi (Posobie dlya studentov wishix uchebnik
zavedenij i uchitelej literaturi) [Theory of literature]. Yerevan: Armuchpetgiz,
1961.

Kratkaya literaturnaya enziklopediya [ Short encyclopedia of literature].
T. 8. M.: Sovetskaya enziklopediya, 1975.

Literaturnij enziklopedicheskij slovar’ [Short encyclopedic dictionary] (pod
red. W. M. Kojevnikowa i P. A. Nikolaeva). M.: Sovetskaya enziklopediya,
1987.

Maksimov Andrej. Neobiknovennya istoriya [Unusual history] // Rossijskaya
gazeta, 2015, 2 noyabrya, N 247 (6818).

Meletinskij E. M. «Edda» i rannie formi eposa [Edda and the early form of
epos]. M.: Nauka, 1968.

Meletinskij E. M. Proisxojdenie geroicheskogo eposa: rannie formi i archaicheskie pamyatniki [The origine of heroic epos: early forms and archaic manuscripts]. Izdanie wtoroe, ispravlennoe. M: Izdatel’skaya firma «Wostochnaya
literature», [1963] 2004.

Mifi narodov mira: Enziklopediya w 2-x tomax / Tom 2 [Encyclopedia in 2
volumes Myth of the peoples of the world]. M.: Sovetskya enziklopediya, 1992.

Poetika: slovar’ aktual’nix terminov i ponyatij (gl. nauch. red. N. D. Tamarchenko) [Poetics: dictionary of contemporary terms and concepts]. M.:
Izd-wo Kulaginoj; Intrada, 2008.

Propp V. Ya. Folklor i dejstvitel’nost‘: Izbrannie stat’yi [Folklore and reality; selected articles]. M.: Nauka, 1976.

Schelling F. Filosofiya iskusstva [Philosophy of Art]. M.: Misl’, 1966.

Slovar‘ inostrannix slov. Izdanie 10-e stereotipnoe [Dictionary of foreign
words]. M.: Russkij yazik, 1983.

Sovetskij enziklopedicheskij slowar’ (gl. red. A. M. Prokhorov) [Soviet encyclopedic dictionary]. M.: Sovetskaya enziklopediya, 1989.

Teoriya literature: Osnownie prinzipi w istoricheskom osvyashenii: Rodi
i janri literature [Theory of literature: basic principles in historic coverage.
Types and genre of literature]. M.: Nauka, 1964.

Teoriya literaturi (pod red. N. D. Tamarchenko) [Theory of literature]. T. 2.
M.: Academia, 2004.

Timofeev L. I. Osnovi teorii literaturi. Izdanie 2-e, ispravlennoe i dopolnennoe [The basics of the theory of literature]. M.: Gosudarstwennoe uchebnopedagogicheskoe id-wo Ministerstva prosvesheniya RSFSR, 1963.

Ushakov M. N. Bol’shoj tolkovij slovar‘ sovremennogo russkogo yazika.
Tom 4 [Large explanatory dictionary of modern Russian language]. M., 1940.

Veselovskij A. N. Istoricheskaya poetika [Historical poetics]. Leningrad:
Gos. izd-wo «Khudozhestvennaya literatura», 1940.

Vvedenie v literaturovedenie (pod red. G. N. Pospelova). 3-e izd., isp. i dop. [Introduction into studies of literature]. M.: Visshaya shkola, 1988.

Vvedenie v literaturovedenie: Uchebnoe posobie (pod red. L. V. Chernez)
[Introduction into studies of literature]. M.: Visshaya shkola, 2004.

Zenkin Sergej. Vvedenie v literaturowedenie: Teoriya literaturi [Introduction
into studies of literature: theory of literature]. M.: Rossijskij gos. gumanit. un-t, 2000.

Bibliographic reference
T. S. Simyan Critical analysis of the ternary opposition epos-epopee-epic class
in the Soviet and post-Soviet literary criticism
// Критика и семиотика. 2016. № 2. Pp. 102–120.