Digital Fuzziness or das Ungefähre
The Semiotics of Cultural Practices in the Digital Realm

Digital Fuzziness or das Ungefähre
The Semiotics of Cultural Practices in the Digital Realm
Авторы (текстом)
J. Krasni
UNIVERSITY OF NIŠ
Keywords
multimodal discourse, online media apparatus, semiotics of digital realms, approximate knowledge, cultural practices
Abstract

This paper reflects on the fuzzy relation between representational
practices in the digital realm, the meaning which emerges out of them and their
role in digital discourses. The media practices acquired by the media users impact
significantly on interpersonal online discourses. The users are, however,
only vaguely aware of the semiotic systems and the culture(s) they (re)create.
Various forms of approximate knowledge can be identified when analysing the
recurring patterns od practices in different contexts. They show how content
related meaning making processes intertwine with both the media format and its
distributional infrastructures.
The theoretical concept of approximate knowledge (das Ungefähre) will be
exemplified with three formats of online multimodal discourses. The digital
fuzzy practices encompass the relation between the distributed media content
and user generated content (UGC) which share the same means of production,
similar dissemination infrastructure and aesthetic standards. This relation represents
the basic thread of the discursive mass production of sense in the online
realm, which is based on approximate knowledge and fuzzy discursive production
by the users. This content in its flow represents series of actions within the
discourse, and it cannot be analysed outside of the technical infrastructure which
it needs in order to exist.

Bibliography

Agamben, Giorgio (2009): What is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Stanford:
Stanford University Press.

Angermuller, Johannes (2014): Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis. Subjectivity in Enunciative Pragmatics. Basingstoke, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

Angermüller, Johannes (2007a): „Diskurs als Aussage und Äußerung. Die
enunziative Dimension in den Diskurstheorien Michel Foucaults und Jacques
Lacans.“ In: Ingo Warnke (Hrsg.): Diskurslinguistik nach Foucault. Theorie und
Gegenstände. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, S. 53–80.

Arnheim, Rudolf (1996 [1972]): Anschauliches Denken. Zur Einheit von
Bild und Begriff. Köln: DuMont.

Assmann, Alleida (2006): „The Printing Press and the Internet: From A Culture
Of Memory To A Culture Of Attention.“ In: Natascha Gentz und Stefan
Kramer (Hrsg.) Globalization, Cultural Identities, and Media Representations.
Albany: State of New York Press, S. 11–23.

Baetens, Jan; Surdiacourt, Steven (2011): „How to ‚Read’ Images with
Texts: The Graphic Novel Case.“ In: Eric Margolis und Luc Pauwels (Hrsg.):
The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London: Sage, S. 590–600.

Bernstein, Basil (1990): The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London:
Routledge.

Boyd-Barrett, Oliver (2010): „Assessing the prospects for an Asian re-configuration of the global news order.” In: Global Media and Communication 6,
S. 346–356.

Delorme, Stéphane and Tessé, Jean-Philippe (2010): Éléments d’autocritique
(ou comment j’ai raté la séance d’Avatar) entretien avec Zlavoj Žižek.
In: Cahiers du Cinema, nr. 655, April 2010.

Ducrot, Oswald (1984): Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.

Foucault, Michel (1980): “The Confession of the Flesh” (1977), interview.
In: Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (ed.
Colin Gordon), London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. pp. 194–228.

Giesecke, Michael (2002): Von den Mythen der Buchkultur zu den Visionen
der Informationsgesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

Herman, David (2009): Basic Elements of Narrative. Oxford: Wiley-
Blackwell.

Knox, John (2007): „Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper
home pages.” In: Visual Communication 6, S. 19–53.

Knox, John (2009): „Punctuating the home page: image as language in an
online newspaper.” In: Discourse & Communication 3, S. 145–172.

Kramer, Stefan (2004): Vom Eigenen und Fremden: Fernsehen und kulturelles
Selbstverständnis in der Volksrepublik China. Bielefeld: transcript.

Kramer, Stefan; Ludes, Peter (2010): Networks of Culture: The World Language
of Key Visuals. Berlin: Lit.

Krasni, Jan (2014): „Re-Bombing in Memento. Traumata of Coventry, Belgrade
and Dresden in Multimodal Collective Memory.” In: Arianna Maiorani,
Christine Christie (Hrsg.): Multimodal Epistemologies. Towards an Integrated
Framework, London: Routledge, S. 131–144.

Krasni, Jan (2017a): Schuld und Krise. Bonuszahlungen und Verantwortung
in Mediendarstellungen der Finanzkrise. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag.

Krasni, Jan (2017b): Soziosemiotik und Diskurspolyphonie. Polyphone Positionierungspraktiken in den multimodalen online-Textformaten. In: Ernest
W. B. Hess-Lüttich, Heidrun Kämpers, Martin Reisigl und Ingo Warnke (Eds.)
Diskurs-Semiotisch: Aspekte multigormaler Diskurskodierung. De Gruyter
Mouton, Berlin/Boeston, pp. 311–338.

Kress, Gunther; van Leeuwen, Theo (2006[1996]): Reading Images:
A Grammar of Visual Design. London: RoutledgeKrasni, Jan (2015): Reflecting
on a Gap Between Polyphony and Multimodality in Online Media Formats. In:
Janina Wildfeuer (Ed.): Building Bridges for Multimodal Research. International
Perspectives on Theories and Practices of Multimodal Analysis. Bern:
Peter Lang.

Ludes, Peter (2001): Multimedia und Multi-Moderne: Schlüsselbilder: Fernsehnachrichten und World Wide Web – Medienzivilisierung in der Europäischen
Währungsunion. (mit CD-Rom). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Machin, David (2004): „Building the World’s Visual Language: The Increasing
Global Importance of Image Banks in Corporate Media.” In: Visual
Communication 3, S. 316–336.

Machin, David; van Leeuwen, Theo (2007): Global Media Discourse:
a Critical Introduction. Routledge, London; New York.

Maingueneau, Dominique (2017): The Heterogeneity of Discourse: Expanding
the Field of Discourse Analysis. In: Palgrave Communications 4. July 2017.
DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.58.

Manovich, Lev (2002): The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT
Press.

Paech, Joachim (2003): „Überlegungen zum Dispositiv als Theorie medialer
Topik“. In: Franz-Josef Albersmeier (Hg.): Texte zur Theorie des Films, Stuttgart: Reclam Verlag, pp. 465–498.

Pêcheux, Michel (1982): Language, Semantics, and Ideology. New York: St.
Martin’s Press.

Ryan, Marie-Laure (2007): „Toward a Definition of Narrative.” In: David
Herman (Ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, S. 22–35.

Schnädelbach, Herbert (2002): Erkenntnistheorie zur Einführung. Hamburg:
Junius.

Schleichkorn, Henry (2007): Stock Photography. In: Michael Peres (Ed.):
Focal Encyclopedia of Photography. 4th Edition. Burlington-Amsterdam: Elsevier/
Focal Press pp.350-353.

Shifman, Limor (2014): Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Surdiacourt, Steven (2012): Tying Ends Together: Surface and Storyworld in
Comics. In: Comics Forum: https://comicsforum.org/2012/12/27/image-narrative-
8-tying-ends-together-surface-and-storyworld-in-comics-by-steven-surdiacourt/.
Retrieved on 15.10.2017.

Thussu, Daya Kishan (2007): Media on the Move: Global Flow and Contra-
Flow. London: Routledge.

Thussu, Daya Kishan (2003): „Live TV and Bloodless Deaths: War, Infotainment
and 24/7 News.” In: Daya Thussu, Dess Freedman (Hrsg.): War and the Media: Reporting Conflict 24/7. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 117–133.

Bibliographic reference
J. Krasni Digital Fuzziness or das Ungefähre
The Semiotics of Cultural Practices in the Digital Realm
// Критика и семиотика. 2018. № 2. Pp. 250–270. DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2018-2-250-270.