Article

Name: There are many ways of ‘doing’ discourse analysis

Authors: E. A. Kozhemyakin

Belgorod National Research University

Abstract: The paper observes the widely assumed historiographic typology of discourse analysis as a research framework in the 2nd part of the XX and the beginning of the XXI centuries. The author describes the key topical trends and referential structure of discourse-analytical publications, and the types of academic self-identification of the scholars in discourse analysis. The article discusses the pragmatics of autopoesis of discourse analysis and perspectives of cross-disciplinary cooperation of discourse-analysts. The special attention is upon the tendencies of discourse analysis’ topics and scholars’ identities drifting off the linguistic field. The author argues the discourse analysis to be a method, he regards one of discourse analysis versions as an engaged academic project and he claims that the real interaction between discourse analysis schools and approaches can only be possible on the topical and teleological, but not methodical basis.

Keywords: discourse analysis, discourse studies, theory of discourse

Bibliography:

Dijk T. A. van. Diskurs i vlast. Reprezentatsija dominirovanija v jazyke i kommunikatsii [Discourse and power. Representation of domination in language and communication]. Moscow, 2013.

Deyneka E. A. Analiz diskursa segodnja, ili Perizh – Moskva sorok let spestja [Analysis of discourse today: Paris – Moscow 40 years after]. Kritika i semiotika [Critics and Semiotics], 2012, no. 17, p. 165–189.

Jerry D., Jerry G. Diskurs-analiz [Discourse analysis]. Bolshoj tolkovyj sotsiologicheskij slovar [Big Sociological Vocabulary]. Moscow, AST, 1999.

Kasavin I. T. Diskurs-analiz [Discourse-analysis]. Entsiklopedija epistemologii I filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of epistemology and philosophy of science]. Moscow, Kanon+, 2009.

Kasavin I. T. Diskurs-analiz kak mezhdistsiplinarnyj metod gumanitarnykh nauk [Discourse-analysis as a cross-disciplinary method of humanities]. Epistemologija I filosofija nauki [Epistemology and Philosophy of Science], 2006, vol. 10, no. 4, p. 5–17.

Makarov M. L. Osnovy teorii diskursa [Introduction to the theory of discourse]. Moscow, Gnosis, 2003.

Pereverzev E. V. Kritika KDA: nekotoryje ogranichenija kriticheskogo diskurs-analiza kak nauchnogo podkhoda [Criticizing CDA: several constraints of the critical discourse analysis as a scientific method]. Sovremennyj diskursanaliz [Contemporary Discourse Analysis], 2009, № 1. URL: http://discourseanalysis.org/ada1/st2.shtml

Rusakova O. F. Osnovnyje raznovidnosti sovremennykh teorij politicheskogo diskursa: opyt klassifikatsij [Main types of contemporary theories of political discourse: a case of classification]. Politeks [Politex], 2006, no. 3, p. 191– 213.

Sarna A. Y. Analiz diskursa (diskurs-analiz) [Analysis of discourse (discourse-analysis)]. Sotsiologija: Entsiklopedija [Sociology: Encyclopedia]. Minsk, Interpressservis, Knizhyj Dom, 2003.

Seriot P. Analiz diskursa vo Frantsuzskoj shkole: diskurs I interdiskurs [Analysis of discourse in the French scholarship: discourse and interdiscourse]. Semiotika: antologija [Semiology: Antology]. Moscow, Ekaterinburg, 2003.

Soboleva M. E. Filosofija kak ‘kritika jazyka’ v Germanii [Philosophy as a ‘critics of language’ in Germany]. St. Petersburg, 2005.

Foucault M. Porjadok diskursa: inauguratsionnaja lektsija v College de France 2.12.70 [Order of discourse: inauguration lecture in College de France 2.12.70].

Foucault M. Volja k istine: pot u storonu znanija, vlasti i seksualnosti [Foucault M. Power to virtue: beyond the knowledge, power and sexuality]. Moscow, 1996, p. 49–96.

Foucault M. Arkheologija znanija [Foucault M. Archeology of knowledge]. St. Petersburg, Gumanitarnaja akademija, 2004.

Shvyrev V. S. Metod [Method]. Entsiklopedija epistemologii i filosofii nauki [Encyclopedia of Epistemology and Philosophy of Science]. Moscow, Kanon+, 2009, p. 494.