|
||||||||
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal for specialists in philology and semiotics |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Reflections on Linguistic Poetics Authors: O. G. Revzina Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract: Cognitive poetics is a part of cognitive science. Cognitive science is a scholarly paradigm of the second half of the 20th – first decades of 21st cent. Cognitive science shares all traits of scholarly paradigm: critics of predecessors, new understanding of investigation object and new conceptual apparatus, new tasks and effective methods of its solution, and its indraft, in the capacity of obligatory, into material of scholarly of fiction. It’s always written about discourse of fiction, that it is at the interface of literary criticism and linguistics. It is exactly literary texts that form the “figure” of modern cognitive poetics, whereas its “background” is religious, humorous texts and also mass-media products. Cognitive poetics devotes itself to the exploration of mental processes, accompanied by communication of reader and text. Notions of prototype and uniformity, conceptual metaphor and metaphorical blending are treated, resting on works of M. Freeman, G. Lakoff, K. Hautley, P. Stockwell. Special attention is payed to incompatibility of cognitive poetics, that proclaims deligitimation of fiction, with philological and structural-semiotic approaches, with ideas of aesthetic function of language and aesthetic value of verbal work of fiction, with concepts of mimesis and catharsis by Aristoteles. In the last part analysis by M. L. Gasparov of the verse by A. Fet (Чудная картина, Как ты мне родна: Белая равнина, Полная луна, свет небес высоких и блестящий снег И саней далеких Одинокий бег) and the verse by Percy Bysshe Shelley «Ozymandias» are discussed. M. L. Gasparov is far from cognitive poetics, but he builds his analysis, resting on the major human cognitive capacity – visual perception and tridimensional text space, reconstructed by him, which implicitly refers to cognitive deixis. Holistic perception is superposed with strong emotional experience and unselfish satisfaction. P. Stockwell, on the contrary, starts from the notion of cognitive deixis and describes its kinds, but, analyzing “Ozymandias”, he applies to well-known figures of different senders and receivers. The parallel is made between sculpture and poet and then – between destroyed statue and text as an archetype. The verse is also concentrated on the production process of creation and on the act of reading: traveler reads inscription and then reads it to narrator, which in its turn reads it to us in the form of verse. Finally Stockwell reaches that explanation of the impact on the reader, made by this verse. Thus, incompatible in theory turns to be pretty compatible in practice. Keywords: cognitive poetics, prototype, uniformity, conceptual metaphor, metaphorical blending, aesthetic value, aesthetic function, scholarly paradigm Bibliography: Akhapkin D. N. Kognitivnaya poetika i problema deyksisa v khudozhestvennom tekste [Cognitive poetics and the problem of deixis in the artistic text]. In: Kognitivnye issledovaniya [Cognitive research]. Moscow, 2012, iss. 5, p. 252–263. (in Russ.) Akhapkin D. N. Kognitivnyy podkhod v sovremennykh issledovaniyakh khudozhestvennykh tekstov [Cognitive approach in modern studies of literary texts]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review], 2012, no. 114, p. 298–312. (in Russ.) Averintsev S. S., Andreev M. L., Gasparov M. L., Grintser P. A., Mikhaylov A. V. Kategorii poetiki v smene literaturnykh epokh [Categories of poetics in the change of literary eras]. In: Istoricheskaya poetika. Literaturnye epokhi i tipy khudozhestvennogo soznaniya [Historical poetics. Literary ages and types of artistic consciousness]. Moscow, Nasledie, 1994. (in Russ.) Crisp P. Conceptual metaphor and its expressions. In: Cognitive Poetics in Practice. Ed. by J. Gavins and G. Steen. London and New York, Routledge, 2003. Fedorova O. V. Eksperimental'nyy analiz diskursa [Experimental Discourse Analysis]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoy kul'tury Publ., 2014. (in Russ.)Freeman M. H. Cognitive language approaches to literary studies: state of the art in cognitive poetics. In: The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford and New York, Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 1175–1202. Gasparov M. L. Fet bezglagol'nyy [Fet nonverbal]. In: Gasparov M. L. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul'tury Publ., 1997, vol. 2: About the verses. (in Russ.) Lakoff G., Turner M. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetics Metaphor. London, The University of Chicago Press Ltd, 1989. Oatley K. Writingangreading: the future of cognitive poetics. In: Cognitive Poetics in Practice. Ed. by Jovanna Gavins and Gerard Steen. London and New York, 2003. Slovar' russkogo yazyka [Russian dictionary]. In 4 vols. Ed. by A. P. Evgenieva. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk Publ., 1984, vol. 4. (in Russ.) Steen G., Gavins J. Contextualizing cognitive poetics. In: Cognitive Poetics in Practice. Ed. by Jovanna Gavins and Gerard Steen. London and New York, 2003. Stockwell P. Cognitive poetics: An Introduction. London and New York, 2002. Whitehead A. N. Izbrannye raboty po filosofii [Selected works on philosophy]. Moscow, Progress, 1990. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |