|
||||||||
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal for specialists in philology and semiotics |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Metalingistic Representation of the Semantics of Comparison as a Linguistic Sign Authors: Natalya B. Koshkareva, Ilya M. Plotnikov Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Abstract: Comparison is analyzed from the point of view of its semantic structure, as opposed to other approaches based on analysis of comparative constructions. Establishing a central semantic framework allows to represent a variety of formally inequable comparative structures in different languages in a systemic way. From the point of view of semantics, comparison is a type of interpropositional relation, which consists of three components: the relation itself and two entities connected by it (relatees). Relation denotes the amount of similarities and differences between relatees, while also giving an assessment of the degree to which these similarities and differences are considered important. A secondary component of the relation is proposed by the name of exponent, which expands on the relation by giving it a more nuanced assessment or representing it in the form of a value such as a numerical measurement. Each relatee constitutes a proposition. It is suggested to view each relatee as a combination of three components (comparee, parameter and modal actualizer), with the possibility that some of them can be shared between relatees, resulting in different ways of expressing the relation. Several classifications of these components are proposed, with the comparees being classified into subject-comparees and event-comparees depending on their propositionality, comparees divided based on their referential properties, and parameters described in terms of their granularity, scalability and direction of the scale. Keywords: comparison, plane of content of language sign, semantic syntax, event propositions, logical propositions, proposition of characterization, Khanty language Bibliography: Barton V. I. Sravnenie kak sredstvo poznaniya [Comparison as means of cognition]. Minsk, BSU Press, 1978, 127 p. (in Russ.) Cheremisina M. I. Sravnitel'nye konstruktsii russkogo yazyka [Comparative constructions in the Russian language]. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 1976, 270 p. (in Russ.) Comte-Sponville A. Filosofskiy slovar'. Dictionnaire philosophique [Philosofic dictionary]. Moscow, Eterna, 2012, 752 p. (in Russ.) Devyatova N. M. Sravnenie v dinamicheskoy sisteme yazyka [Comparison in the dynamic language system]. Moscow, LIBROKOM, 2017, 320 p. (in Russ.) Fedina N. N., Koshkareva N. B. Reduktsiya kak mekhanizm var'irovaniya sravnitel'nykh analitiko-sinteticheskikh polipredikativnykh konstruktsii s poslelogom shylap // shchylap // shchynap ‘kak, kak budto’ v chalkanskom yazyke [Reduction as a mechanism of variation of comparative analytical-synthetic polypredicative constructions with the postposition shylap // schylap // schynap ‘as if’ in the Chalkan language]. Languages and Folklore of Indigenous Peoples of Siberia, 2023, no. 2 (iss. 46), pp. 53‒64. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/2312-6337-2023-2-53-64 Frolov I. T. Filosofskiy slovar' [Philosophic dictionary]. Moscow, Respublika, 2001, 719 p. (in Russ.) Greimas A.-J. Strukturnaya semantika. Poisk metoda [Structural semantics. Searching for a method]. Moscow, Akademicheskiy proekt, 2004, 368 p. (in Russ.) Haspelmath M., Buchholz O. Equative and similative constructions in the languages of Europe. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 1998, pp. 277–334. Ilichev L. F. Filosofskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Philosophic encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1983, 839 p. (in Russ.) Ivin A. A. Filosofiya: entsiklopedicheskiy slovar' [Philosophy: encyclopedic dictionary]. Moscow, Gardariki, 2004, 1072 p. (in Russ.) Kartsevsky S. O. Sravnenie [Comparison]. Voprosy Yazykoznaniya [Topics in the study of language], 1976, no. 1, pp. 107–112. (in Russ.) Kondakov N. I. Logicheskiy slovar'-spravochnik [Logical reference dictionary]. Moscow, Nauka, 1975, 720 p. (in Russ.) Krylova M. N. Sravnitel'naya konstruktsiya v prostranstve sovremennogo khudozhestvennogo teksta. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul'tury i iskusstv,2013, no. 22–2, pp. 34–42. (in Russ.) Kvyatkovskiy A. P. Poeticheskiy slovar' [Poetic dictionary]. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1966, 375 p. (in Russ.) Lebedeva L. A. Ustojchivye sravneniya russkogo yazyka: kratkij tematicheskij slovar' [Stable comparisons of the Russian language: a brief thematic dictionary]. Moscow, FLINTA. 2017, 283 p. (in Russ.) Malykh L. M. Sravnenie kak logicheskaya osnova obydennogo i nauchnogo po-znaniya. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Teoriya yazyka. Semiotika. Semantika, 2014, no. 2, pp. 5–14. (in Russ.) Maslova V. A. Lingvokul'turologiya: ucheb. posobie dlya studentov vuzov [Linguoculturology: textbook for university students]. Moscow, Academia, 2004, 202 p. (in Russ.) Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost' s deystvitel'nost'yu: referentsial'nye aspekty semantiki mestoimeniy [The utterance and its correlation with reality: referential aspects of the semantics of pronouns]. Moscow, LKI, 2007, 2009, 292 p. (in Russ.) Petrovskiy A. V., Yaroshevskiy M. G. Kratkiy psikhologicheskiy slovar' [Brief philological dictionary]. Rostov on Don, Feniks, 1998, 512 p. (in Russ.) Priyatkina A. F. Russkiy yazyk. Sintaksis oslozhnennogo predlozheniya [Russian language. Syntax of complicated sentence]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1990, 90 p. (in Russ.) Sannikov V. Z. Russkiy sintaksis v semantiko-pragmaticheskom prostranstve [Russian syntax in semantico-pragmatic area]. Moscow, LRC Publ., 2008, 624 p. (in Russ.) Treis Y., Vanhove M. (eds.). Similative and Equative Constructions: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective (Typological Studies in Language, 117). Amsterdam, Philadelphia, John Benjamins, 2017, 437 p. Stassen L. Comparison and Universal Grammar. Oxford, New York, B. Blackwell, 1985, 383 p. Tomashevskiy B. V. Stilistika: uchebnoe posobie [Stylistics: textbook]. Leningrad, LSU Press, 1983, 288 p. (in Russ.) Tozhdestvo i podobie: sravnenie i identifikatsiya [Identity and similarity: comparison and identification]. Moscow, Institute of Linguistics SA USSR, 1990, 225 p. (in Russ.) Vinogradov V. V. Stilistika. Teoriya poeticheskoy rechi. Poetika [Stylistics. Theory of poetic speech. Poetics]. Moscow, AS USSR, 1963, 251 p. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |