Article

Name: “Following the Fatal Question”: Representation of Ideological Discourse in the 1860s (Strakhov and Other)

Authors: Alexey E. Kozlov

Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

Abstract:

The article examines two remarks to the article by N. N. Strakhov “The Fatal Question” (1863): “From Travel Memories of Polonism” (1867) and “Political Conversation with the Poles” (1870). Both texts appeared on the pages of the new periodicals “World Work” and “Zarya”, following the traditions of the magazines “Moskvityanin”, “Vremya” and “Epoch”. Despite the difference in editorial tactics and strategies, it can be stated that in both cases the monologue discourse of the original article was transferred into a dialogic channel and staged, arranged as a conversationon a train. Thus, the arguments presented by Strakhov were presented in essays, skits and impromptu interviews for propaganda purposes.

At the end of the article, a hypothesis is put forward about the attribution of the two texts under consideration Strakhov, and also a hypothesis is put forward about the semiotics of behavior, determined by the addition and commenting on a previously completed work, which brought disappointment and trauma to its creator.

In this case, the defining figure in this model was and remains Gogol, the author of The Government Inspector, who felt an urgent need to convey to the reader the innermost thing he was trying to express. Of course, with each new iteration, Gogol moved further and further away from the position of the author, expressing the voice of a non-trivial and exceptional reader. A similar paradox was associated with Dead Souls. Strakhov, as some pages of his biography show, was prone to resentment, and the ban on his article, as well as the closure of the “Vremya” magazine, was experienced by him as an insult to his honor and dignity, a doubt thrown into the public arena in his competence and objectivity. Using a stable plot situation of a conversation on a train, Strakhov, experiencing the catastrophe that befell the original text (in his eyes, practically The Government Inspector), created his variations of Theatrical Passage. However, the difference was that the critic and publicist Kositsa was never able to go beyond the limits of speculative journalism built on the manipulation of public opinion. In this he differed from his brilliant interlocutors – Dostoevsky and Tolstoy – whose artistic texts, by no means limited to roadside conversations about the fateful questions of modernity, demonstrated a breakthrough to the transcendental.

Keywords: Russian literature, Russian journalism, “World Labor”, “Zarya”, E. A. Khan, V. V. Kashpirev, N. N. Strakhov, Russia and Poland

Bibliography:

Anninsky L. Leskovskoe ozherel'e [Leskov Necklace]. St. Petersburg, 2012, 560 р. (in Russ.)

Domansky Yu. V. Variativnost' v pesennykh tekstakh “Razgovor v poezde” [Variability in the song lyrics “Conversation on the Train”]. Russkaya rok-poeziya: tekst i kontekst, 2010, no. 11, pp. 69–75. (in Russ.)

Filippovsky G. Yu., Zimina L. I. Metaforicheskoe prostranstvo kontsepta zheleznaya doroga v tekstakh russkikh i evropeiskikh romantikov XIX v. [Metaphorical Space of the Concept Railway in the Texts of Russian and European Romantics of the 19th Century]. Verkhnevolzhskiy filologicheskiy vestnik, 2019, no 2, pp. 8–15. (in Russ.) DOI 10.24411/2499-9679-2019-10379

Fridlender G. M. Kommentarii: F. M. Dostoevsky. Vechnyy muzh [Comments: F. M. Dostoevsky. The Eternal Husband]. In: Dostoevsky F. M. Collected works. In 15 vols. Leningrad, Nauka, 1990, vol. 8, pp. 695–706. (in Russ.)

Ipatova S. A. Kto zhe byl avtorom akrostikha “Dikarka”, podpisannogo “A. Fet” (mistifikatsiya ili parodiya). In: Genres in the historical and literary process: Collection of scientific articles. St. Petersburg, 2015, iss. 6, pp. 17–24. (in Russ.)

Kapustina I. O. Sotrudnichestvo F. M. Dostoevskogo s zhurnalom V. V. Kashpireva “Zarya” [Collaboration of F. M. Dostoevsky with the magazine of V. V. Kashpirev “Zarya”]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Ser. 10. Journalistics, 2015, no. 5, pp. 51–65. (in Russ.)

Kherlt Y. “Na kakom rasstoyanii konchaetsya chelovekolyubie?”: Tolstoy i Dostoevskiy v 1877 godu: sotsial'naya epistemologiya romana [“At What Distance Does Love for Humanity End?”: Tolstoy and Dostoevsky in 1877: The Social Epistemology of the Novel]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2019, no. 1 (155), pp. 42–61. (in Russ.)

Kibalnik S. A. K razgadke odnoy pisatel'skoy diffamatsii: pochemu N. N. Strakhov oklevetal F. M. Dostoevskogo [Towards the solution of one writer’s defamation: why N. N. Strakhov slandered F. M. Dostoevsky]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Filologiya, 2018, no. 55, pp. 191–211. (in Russ.) DOI 10.17223/19986645/55/13

Kozlov A. E. “Libel of Literature”: “The World Labor” and “Day Spring” in the Estimates of the Satirical Weekly Magazine “Iskra”. Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology, 2020, vol. 19, no. 6: Journalism, pp. 9–20. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/1818-7919-2020-19-6-9-20

Kozlov A. E., Vasilenko A. G. et al. Vidimy miru smekh: Literatura 1860–1870-kh godov v zerkale groteska, parodii i stilizatsii [Laughter visible to the world: Literature of the 1860–1870s in the mirror of the grotesque, parody and stylization]. Moscow, 2023, 597 p. (in Russ.)

Kozmin B. P. Iz istorii revolyutsionnoi mysli v Rossii [From the history of revolution ideas in Russia]. Moscow, Nauka, 1961, 764 p. (in Russ.)

Shatin Yu. V. “Anna Karenina” – F. M. Dostoevskogo. Kazus ritoriki [“Anna Karenina” by F. M. Dostoevsky. A Case of Rhetoric]. Critique and semiotics, 2023, no. 2, pp. 292–301. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/2307-1753-2023-2-292-301

Toichkina A. V. N. N. Strakhov, zhurnal “Zarya” i tvorchestvo F. M. Dostoevskogo kontsa 1860-kh gg. [Strakhov, the “Zarya” Magazine, and the Works of F. M. Dostoevsky in the Late 1860s]. Vestnik SPbGU. Yazyk i literature, 2021, no. 3, pp. 479–497. (in Russ.)

Zubkov K. Yu. Slova-signaly nigilizma i “Obryv” I. A. Goncharova [Words-signals of nihilism and “Precipice” by I. A. Goncharov]. Critique and Semiotics, 2018, no. 2, pp. 25–39. (in Russ.)