|
||||||||
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal for specialists in philology and semiotics |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Discourse and Semiotic Analysis of Incongruity in Leonid Gaidai’s Cinematic Comedies of Khrushchev’s Thaw Authors: Diana N. Serozeeva, Maria I. Kiose Moscow State Linguistic University, Moscow, Russian Federation; Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation
Abstract: The research aims to study the discursive-semiotic arrangement of incongruity which ensures event construal in L. Gaidai’s comedies. The article develops the analysis procedure which identifies the distribution of incongruity aligned and not aligned with euphemization in different discourse layers featuring the semiotic cues of their realization. The results specify the variance in the predominance of verbal and visual components mediated by both incongruity type and its discourse layer, as well as the significance of the sociocultural aspect in event construal in L. Gaidai’s thaw comedies. Keywords: comedy film, incongruity, semiotic modality, discursive-parametric analysis, euphemization, L. Gaidai Bibliography: Agafonova N. A. Obshchaya teoriya kino i osnovy analiza fil'ma [General theory of cinema and the foundations of film analysis]. Minsk, Tesey Publ., 2008, 392 p. (in Russ.) Asseel D. A. Seeing the unseen: Euphemism in animated films: A multi-modal and critical discourse analysis. PhD Diss. Lancaster University, 2020, 374 p. Burridge K. Euphemism and Language Change: The Sixth and Seventh Ages. Lexis, 2012, vol. 7, pp. 65–92. Colston H. Using Figurative Language. Cambridge, Cambridge Uni. Press, 2015, 284 p. Dijk T. A. van. Cognitive Context Models and Discourse. In: Stamenow M. (ed.). Language Structure, Discourse and the Access to Consciousness. Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1997, pp. 189–226. Dijk T. A. van, Kintch W. Strategies of Discourse. New York, Academic Press, 1983, 427 p. Eitan Z. Cross-modal experience of musical pitch as space and motion. In: Wollner C. (ed.). Body, Sound and Space in Music. Multimodal Explorations. Routledge, 2018, pp. 49–68. Frolov I. D. V luchah ekstsentriki: O kinorezhissere L. Gaidae [In the Rays of Eccentricity: About cinema director L. Gaidai]. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1991, 192 p. (in Russ.) Hempelmann Ch. F., Attardo S. Resolutions and their incongruities: Further thoughts on Logical Mechanisms. Humor, 2011, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 125–149. Iriskhanova O. K. Igry fokusa v yazyke. Semantika, sintaksis i pragmatika defokusirovaniya [Focus shifts in the language: semantics, syntax and pragmatics of defocusing]. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury Publ., 2014, 320 p. (in Russ.) Kiose M. I. Tekstovaya i diskursivnaya lingvokreativnost' detskoi priklyuchencheskoi povesti v angloyazychnoi literature [Text and discourse linguistic creativity of children’s English-language adventure fiction]. Tomsk State University Journal, 2021, no. 466, pp. 5–15. (in Russ.) Levitsky A. E. Diskursivnaya situatsiya i problema ponimaniya v aspekte referentnosti i kommunikativnosti [Discourse situation and the problem of understanding within the aspects of reference and communication]. Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, 2019, no. 1, pp. 12–22. (in Russ.) Levchenko Ya., Shemyakin A. Dva predisloviya ot lyudei raznykh pokolenii [Two prefaces from people of different generations]. In: Chelovek s brilliantovoi rukoi. K 100-letiyu Leonida Gaidaya [The man with a diamond arm. On the occasion of the centenary of the birth of Leonid Gaidai]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2023, pp. 6–12. (in Russ.) Lipovetsky M. Trikstery u Gaidaya [Gaidai’s tricksters]. In: Chelovek s brilliantovoi rukoi. K 100-letiyu Leonida Gaidaya [The man with a diamond arm. On the occasion of the centenary of the birth of Leonid Gaidai]. Moscow, Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2023, pp. 51–67. (in Russ.) Lotman Yu. M. Semiotika kino i problemy kinoestetiki [Semiotics of cinema and problems of film aesthetics]. Tallinn, Eesti Raamat, 1973, 135 p. (in Russ.) Lotman Yu., Tsivyan Yu. Dialog s ekranom [Dialogue with the Screen]. Tallinn, Aleksandra, 1994, 214 p. (in Russ.) Razzakov F. I. Leonid Gaidai. Lyubimaya sovetskaya komediya [Leonid Gaidai. Favorite Soviet Comedy]. Moscow, Rodina Publ., 2018, 288 p. (in Russ.) Senichkina E. P., Nikitina I. N. Ironicheskie evfemizmy kak primeta vremeni [Ironic euphemisms as a sign of time]. Almanac of modern science and education, 2007, no. 3-3, pp. 199–201. (in Russ.) Sokolova O. V. Lingvokreativnost' v reklamnom i poeticheskom diskursakh [Linguistic creativity in advertising and poetic discourse]. In: Zykova I. V. (ed.). Lingvokreativnost' v diskursakh raznykh tipov: predely i vozmozhnosti [Linguistic creativity in different types of discourses: Its Limits and Possibilities]. Moscow, Valent Publ., 2021, pp. 258–362. (in Russ.) Zykova I. V. Interdiskursivnye parametry lingvokreativnosti (na materiale kinodiskursa) [Interdiscursive Parameters of Linguistic Creativity (The Case Study of Cinematic Discourse)]. Kritika i semiotika [Critique and Semiotics], 2021, no. 2, pp. 11–29. (in Russ.) Zykova I. V. Lingvokreativnost' v kinodiskurse [Linguistic creativity in cinematic discourse]. In Zykova I. V. (ed.). Lingvokreativnost' v diskursakh raznykh tipov: predely i vozmozhnosti [Linguistic creativity in different types of discourses: Its Limits and Possibilities]. Moscow, Valent Publ., 2021, pp. 100–189. (in Russ.) Zykova I. V., Kiose М. I. Parametrizatsiya lingvisticheskoi kreativnostiv mezhdiskursivnom aspekte: kinodiskurs vs diskurs detskoi literatury [Linguistic creativity parametrization in contrasting discourse types: Cinematic discourse vs discourse of children’s literature]. Issues of Cognitive Linguistics, 2020, vol. 2, pp. 26–40. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |