Article

Name: From Things to Concepts: Cognitive-Semiotic Notes about the «House of the Philosopher» by Czesław Miłosz

Authors: E. E. Brazgovskaya

Perm State Humanitarian Pedagogical University, Russian Federation

Abstract:

The article offers a cognitive-semiotic analysis of Czesław Miłosz Polish-language text «Dom filozofa» («A Philosopher's Home», 1991). Simul- taneously, we discuss the possibility of talking about the algorithms of thinking in the form of an artistic narrative. How does the philosopher think? This is the theme proposed by Miłosz. The subject of his essay is the steps of abstraction, according to which the philosopher goes to the whole picture of the world.

Philosopher works with mental representations – a system of objects of a complex ontological nature: the woman’s running in a green dress on the stairs, slamming the car door. The logic of the verbal representation of the world consists in removing the word from the thing. The philosopher collects the de- tails of the world in the form of iconic signs. Ascending the steps of abstraction, he gives autonomy to attributes (running up as such) and, on the contrary, cre- ates «things in themselves» – objects outside their qualities (stems outside the girl cutting them, color, forms). The multiplicity of the world is reduced to cata- logs, where each member (a scream «Oh!») is a sign of a fuzzy set. The thinker uses the various ways of information compression: paradigms, processes of al- ternative categorization. In the end, this is the way to the birth of concepts.

The language of thinking is based on working with «living concepts» that bring abstraction closer to a person. The other side of the word is the image of another modality. Miłosz puts the emphasis on the verbal-visual representation of the world – its ocular-centric nature. In the «cognitive tango» of languages, two verbal systems (Polish, Latin) are presented in the current mode, while the visual image is of a mental nature.

The philosopherʼs eye is similar to J. L. Borges’s Aleph, allowing to see a space in the form of a «map» – simultaneous plurality of things. His linguistic consciousness is like a time machine. Existing in the twentieth century, the phi- losopher «watches» the Venice Council of Ten (1310), the birth of cuneiform, dinosaur pastures, intergalactic spaces. According to Miłosz, the freedom of movement through loci and times puts an equal sign between the consciousness of f man and God, devoid of the mortal body. Modern science is considering the literature and art as a periphery of cognitive-semiotic studies, where the figura- tive forms of representation of knowledge (and in the case of Miłosz, its intuitive foresight) become a tool for popularizing information about the work of human thinking. In cognitive science the mechanism of thinking, described by Czesław Miłosz, is analyzed in the framework of the theory of mental spaces, conceptual integration, double coding of information, image schemes.

Keywords: mental representation, iconic signs, multimodal coding, complementarity of languages, conceptualization, Czeslaw Milosz

Bibliography:

Anokhin K. V. Mozg uchenogo: kak on poznaet istinu. Lektsiya na Festivale nauki MGU. 2016. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npmuw IgO2Og (accessed: 15.02.2018). (in Russ.)

Brodskiy I. Maloe sobranie sochineniy. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika Publ., 2010, 880 p. (in Russ.)

Brodskiy I. Naberezhnaya neistselimykh. Esse. Transl. from Engl. by G. Dashevskiy. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-Klassika Publ., 2006, 192 p. (in Russ.)

Chernigovsraya T. V. Cheshirskaya ulybka kota Shryodingera: yazyk i soznanie. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskoi kultury, 2013, 448 p. (in Russ.)

Evans V., Green M. Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 2006, 830 p.

Fauconnier G., Turner M. The way we think: conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York, Basic Books, 2002, 440 p.

Gibbs R. W., Colston H. The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 1995, no. 6, p. 347–378.

Hass R. Praise. New York, Harper Collins Publ., 1979, p. 4–6.

Johnson М. The philosophical significance of image schemas. From perception to meaning: image schemas in cognitive linguistics. Eds. Beate Hampe, Joseph E. Grady. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter, 2005, p. 15–35.

Lehrer J. Proust Was a Neuroscientist. Boston, New York, Houghton Mifflin Company, 2007, 307 p.

Mandelshtam O. Stikhotvoreniya, perevody, ocherki, statii. Tbilisi, Merani Publ., 1990, 415 p. (in Russ.)

Mangel А. Curiositas. Lyubopytstvo. Transl. from Engl. by A. Zakharevich. St. Petersburg, Ivan Limbakh Publ., 2017. 472 p. (in Russ.)

Miłosz Cz. Ciekawość. In: Miłosz Cz. Abecadło. Kraków, Wydawnictwo literackie, 2010, s. 97–99. (in Pol.)

Miłosz Cz. Dom filozofa. In: Miłosz Cz. Wiersze wszystkie. Kraków, Znak, 2011, s. 1039–1041. (in Pol.)

Paivio A. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford, Ox- ford University Press, 1986, 322 р.

Stockwell P. Cognitive Poetics. An Introduction. London, New York, Routledge, 2002, 204 p.

Zbikowski L. M. The Cognitive Tango. The Artful Mind: Cognitive Science and the Riddle of Human Creativity. Ed. by Mark Turner. Oxford University Press, 2006, p. 132–150.

Zinchenko V. P. Soznanie i tvorcheskiy akt. Moscow, Yazyki slavyanskikh kultur, 2010, 592 p. (in Russ.)