|
||||||||
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal for specialists in philology and semiotics |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Uspeem khorosho esli k semi (‘Will Success to Arrive Good if by Seven’): Subordination Decay and Lexicalization of the Contact Frame Authors: M. Ya. Dymarsky Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia; Institute for Linguistic Studies RAS
Abstract: The article is devoted to one of Russian “minor type sentences” illustrated in the title. Derivation of the construction is considered, including the processes of 1) retracting the main part of the complex sentence into the subordinate clause; 2) the loss of the function of the contact frame by the complex khorosho esli and its lexicalization as a particle adjacent to the predicate, and at the last stage of lexicalization – to any actant or circonstant. Changing the status of the complex khorosho esli gives rise to the semantic effect of splitting the displayed situation, the establishment of estimation- gradational relations between the variants of the situation, as well as the implicatures that make up the main meaning of the statement as a whole. Prerequisites arise for the formation of new derivative unions (khorosho esli... a to i ... and the like.). The characteristic of the intonation contour is given which obligatorily accompanies the functioning of the particle khorosho esli; the conclusion is substantiated that the grounds for separating the elements of a new particle by a comma disappear. Keywords: minor type sentences, contact frame of a complex sentence, lexicalization, disintegration of subordination, retraction of the main part into the subordinate clause, implicature, punctuation Bibliography: Ageenko F. L., Zarva M. V. Slovar' udareniy russkogo yazyka [Accentologic dictionary of Russian]. M. A. Shtudiner (ed.). Moscow, Rolf Publishing house, 2000, 816 p. (in Russ.) Apresyan Yu. D., Boguslavskiy I. M., Iomdin L. L., Sannikov V. Z. Teoreticheskie problemy russkogo sintaksisa: Vzaimodeystvie grammatiki i slovarya [Theoretical problems of the Russian syntax: The grammar-vocabulary interface]. Yu. D. Apresyan (ed.). Moscow, LRC Publishing house, 2010, 408 p. (in Russ.) Dymarskiy M. Ya. Problemy tekstoobrazovaniya i khudozhestvennyy tekst (na materiale russkoy prozy XIX–XX vv.) [Text formation problems and literary text (on the material of Russian fiction of 19th–20th centuries]. 3rd ed., rev. Moscow, URSS Publishing group, 2006, 296 p. (in Russ.) Dymarskiy M. Ya. Pragmatika sintaksicheskoy proizvodnosti: igra «svoego» i «chuzhogo» v sluchae “Ya ne bezumets lezt' pod puli” [Pragmatics of syntactic derivateness: play of „own” and „alien” in the case of I am not a madman to go under bullets]. In: I. P. Kyul'moya (ed.). Acta Slavica Estonica VIII. Trudy po russkoy i slavyanskoy filologii. Lingvistika XVII. Svoe – chuzhoe v yazyke i rechi [Proceedings in Russian and Slavic philology. Linguistics XVII. Own and alien in language and speech]. Tartu, Tartu Uni. Press, 2016, p. 64–77. (in Russ.) Ilienko S. G. Voprosy teorii slozhnopodchinennogo predlozheniya v sovremennom russkom yazyke [Topics in the study of subordinate complex sentence in contemporary Russian]. Abstract of habilitation thesis. Leningrad, 1964, 37 p. (in Russ.) Ilienko S. G., Dymarskiy M. Ya. (eds.). Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk. Sintaksis [Contemporary Russian. Syntax]. Textbook for undergraduate students. Moscow, Urait Publishing house, 2016, 391 p. (in Russ.) Iomdin L. L. Khorosho menya tam ne bylo: sintaksis i semantika odnogo klassa russkikh razgovornykh konstruktsiy [It’s good I wasn’t there: Syntax and semantics of a class of Russian colloquial constructions]. In: Grammaticalization and Lexicalization in the Slavic Languages. München, Berlin, Washington D.C., Verlag Otto Sagner, 2014, Bd. 55, S. 423–436. (in Russ.) Iomdin L. L. Konstruktsii mikrosintaksisa, obrazovannye russkoy leksemoy raz [Microsyntax constructions based on the Russian lexeme raz]. SLAVIA, časopis pro slovanskou filologii [SLAVIA, journal of Slavic philology], 2015, vol. 84, iss. 3, p. 291– 306. (in Russ.) Kibrik A. A. Kognitivnye issledovaniya po diskursu [Cognitive studies of discourse]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya [Topics in the study of language], 1994, no. 5, p. 126– 139. (in Russ.) Lotman Yu. M. Kul'tura i vzryv [Culture and explosion]. Moscow, Gnosis; Progress Publishing group, 1992, 272 p. (in Russ.) Moskalskaya O. I. Grammatika teksta [Text grammars]. Moscow, Higher school publishing, 1981, 183 p. (in Russ.) Rakhilina E. V., Kuznetsova Yu. L. Grammatika konstruktsiy: teoriya, storonniki, blizkie idei [Construction grammar: theory, proponents, related ideas]. In: E. V. Rakhilina (ed.). Lingvistika konstruktsiy [Construction linguistics]. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publishing Centre, 2010, p. 18–82. (in Russ.) Shvedova N. Yu. (ed.). Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]: In 2 vols. Moscow, Nauka, 1980, vol. 2. Sintaksis [Syntax], 712 p. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |