Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
ISSN 2307–1753 [16+]
Founder — Institute of Philology, SB RAS
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal
for specialists in philology and semiotics
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Lexical and Grammatical Environment and Its Influence on the Noun Case Form in Russian Language

Authors: I. E. Kim

Institute of Philology SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)

Issue 2, 2020Pages 129-151
UDK: 811.161.1; 81.366.54; 81.367.4DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-2-129-151

Abstract: This article is devoted to a new phenomenon in modern Russian language. Earlier, a native speaker of Russian chose a noun case form depending on the “requirements” of the grammatically dominant word. Nowadays, more and more often, a native speaker chooses a noun case taking into account the influence of several words included in its lexical and grammatical environment. The article discusses in detail all the potential elements of the lexical and grammatical environment of a noun that can influence on the choice of its case form, and provides facts of their consolidated or contradictory influence, which creates a choice problem. The lexical and grammatical environment of a noun potentially includes a controlling word, homogeneous terms of a sentence and generalizing word for them, a preposition that can be combined with several case forms, an adjective, participle or number dependent on the noun, as well as other nouns nearby. Each of the elements of the environment influences the choice of case in its own way, so the speaker often chooses a case form incorrectly. The phenomenon illustrates the antinomy of language: 1) being singled out as part of a syntagm, a linguistic expression seeks to expand its existence at the expense of other linguistic expressions; 2) being singled out as part of a syntagm, a linguistic expression is subjected to pressure from neighboring linguistic expressions.

Keywords: antinomies of the language, declension of a noun, grammatical homonymy, active processes in modern Russian, mistakes in the use of noun case, syntagmatics, precede-and-command principle of case agreement

Bibliography:

Apresyan Yu. D. Idei i metody sovremennoy strukturnoy lingvistiki (kratkiy ocherk). Moscow, 1966, 301 p. (in Russ.)

Apresyan Yu. D. Eksperimental’noe issledovanie semantiki russkogo glagola. Moscow, 1967, 251 p. (in Russ.)

Apresyan Yu. D. Leksicheskaya semantika. Sinonimicheskie sredstva yazyka. Moscow, 1974, 367 p. (in Russ.)

Batura T. V., Charintseva M. V. Osnovy obrabotki tekstovoy informatsii: Ucheb. posobiye. Novosibirsk, 2016, 45 p. (in Russ.)

Beloshapkova V. A. Sintaksis. In: Sovremenny russkiy yazyk. 2 nd ed. Moscow, 1989, p. 532–792. (in Russ.)

Bondarko A. V. Teoriya morfologicheskikh kategoriy. Leningrad, Nauka 1976, 255 p. (in Russ.).

Cheremisina M. I. How the Predicate Valence Forms the Basic Simple Sentence. Zhurnal SFU. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2008, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 184–192.

Chesnokova L. D. Grammaticheskaya sochetayemost’ slov v prostom predlozhenii i faktory, obuslovlivayushchie ee. In: Sochetayemost’ yazykovykh edinits. Rostov on Don, 1968, p. 5–22. (in Russ.)

Gak V. G. Yazykovye preobrazovaniya Moscow, 1998, 763 p. (in Russ.)

Glovinskaya M. Ya. Aktivnyye protsessy v grammatike (na materiale innovatsiy i massovykh yazykovykh oshibok). In: Russkiy yazyk kontsa XX stoletiya (1985–1995). 2 nd ed. Moscow, 2000, p. 237–304. (in Russ.)

Katsnelson S. D. K ponyatiyu tipov valentnosti. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 1987, no. 3, p. 20–32. (in Russ.)

Kim I. E. Lichnaya sfera cheloveka: struktura i yazykovoe voploshchenie. Krasnoyarsk, 2009, 325 p. (in Russ.)

Kim I. E. Sotsial’nyye sub’’ekty: printsipy nominatsii. Vestnik of Novgorod State Uni. Series: Philology. History, 2010, no. 57, p. 47–51. (in Russ.)

Kim I. E. Tri sposoba modelirovaniya sotsial’nykh realiy v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Siberian Journal of Philology, 2011, p. 192–199. (in Russ.)

Kim I. E. Tendentsiya k razrusheniyu russkoy padezhnoy sistemy i predskazuemost’ sintaksicheskoy svyazi v teorii sintaksisa V. A. Beloshapkovoy. Vestnik of Tomsk Sate University. Series: Philology, 2018, no. 51, p. 9–24. (in Russ.) DOI 10.17223/19986645/51/2

Kotelova N. Z. Znachenie slova i ego sochetaemost’ (k formalizatsii v yazykoznanii). Leningrad, 1975, 64 p. (in Russ.)

Kozlovskaya T. L. Obshchestvenno-gruppovaya otsenka upotrebleniya umen’shitel’no-laskatel’nykh obrazovaniy v rechi nositeley sovremennogo russkogo yazyka. In: Kul’tura russkoy rechi i effektivnost’ obshcheniya. Moscow, 1996, p. 425–436. (in Russ.)

Levi-Bruhl L. Sverkh’’estestvennoye v pervobytnom myshlenii. Moscow, 1994, 608 p. (in Russ.)

Miloslavskiy I. G. Morfologiya. In: Sovremenny russkiy yazyk. 2 nd ed. Moscow, 1989, p. 532–792. (in Russ.)

Morkovkin V. V. Osnovy teorii uchebnoy leksikografii. Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Moscow, 1990, 72 p. (in Russ.)

Novitskaya I. M. K sintaksisu svyaznogo teksta (na materiale nemetskogo yazyka): Avtoref. dis. ... kand. filol. nauk. Leningrad, 1973, 22 p. (in Russ.)

Otkupshchikova M. I. Mestoimeniya sovremennogo russkogo yazyka v strukturno-semanticheskom aspekte: Ucheb. Posobiye. Leningrad, 1984, 87 p. (in Russ.)

Paducheva E. V. Denotativny status imennoy gruppy i ego otrazhenie v semanticheskom predstavlenii predlozheniya. Nauch.-tekhn. inform. Series 2, 1979, no. 9, p. 25–31. (in Russ.)

Paducheva E. V. Vozvratnoye mestoimeniye s kosvennym antetsedentom i semantika refleksivnosti. In: Semiotika i informatika. Moscow, VINITI, 1983, iss. 21, p. 3–33. (in Russ.)

Paducheva E. V. Vyskazyvanie i ego sootnesennost’ s deystvitel’nost’yu (Referentsial’nye aspekty semantiki mestoimeniy). Moscow, Nauka, 1985, 271 p. (in Russ.)

Pike K. L. Grammemic Theory in Reference to Restricted Problems of Morpheme Classes. International Journal of American Linguistics, 1957, vol. 23, no. 3 (jul.), p. 119–128. DOI 10.1086/464406

Ryabov V. N. Russkie intrayazykovye lakuny (formal’no-semanticheskiy aspekt). Avtoref. dis. ... d-ra filol. nauk. Krasnodar, 1997, 42 p. (in Russ.)

Saussure F. de. Kurs obshchey lingvistiki. In: Saussure F. de. Trudy po yazykoznaniyu. Moscow, Progress, 1977, p. 7–285. (in Russ.)

Shmelev D. N. Problemy semanticheskogo analiza leksiki. Moscow, 1973, 244 p. (in Russ.)

Stolyarova E. A. Sushchestvitel’nye. In: Razgovornaya rech’ v sisteme funktsional’nykh stiley sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: Leksika. Saratov, Saratov State Uni. Press, 1983, p. 21–48. (in Russ.)

Tesniere L. Osnovy strukturnogo sintaksisa. Moscow, 1988, 656 p. (in Russ.)

Testelets Ya. G. Refleksivizatsiya i tipologiya anafory. In: Tipologiya grammaticheskikh kategoriy: Tez. dokl. Vsesoyuz. nauch. konf. Leningrad, 1991, p. 47–48. (in Russ.)

Valgina N. S. Sintaksis sovremennogo russkogo yazyka: Uchebnik. Moscow, 2000, 416 p. (in Russ.)

Vezhbitskaya A. Russkiy yazyk. In: Vezhbitskaya A. Yazyk. Kul’tura. Poznaniye. Moscow, 1997, p. 33–88. (in Russ.)

Vorotnikov Yu. L. Stepeni kachestva v sovremennom russkom yazyke. Moscow, 1999, 281 p. (in Russ.)

Yantsenetskaya M. N., Lebedeva N. B., Grushko N. E. et al. Semanticheskie voprosy slovoobrazovaniya: Znacheniye proizvodyashchego slova. Tomsk, 1991, 272 p. (in Russ.)

Zaliznyak A. A. Russkoye imennoye slovoizmenenie. Moscow, Nauka, 1967, 370 p. (in Russ.)

Zemskaya E. A. Sovremenny russkiy yazyk. Slovoobrazovanie. Moscow, 1973, 304 p. (in Russ.)

Zolotova G. A. Sintaksicheskiy slovar’: Repertuar elementarnykh edinits russkogo sintaksisa. Moscow, 1988, 440 p. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology