Article

Name: Semiopoesis: Formation of Meaning in Molecular Genetics and Biosemiotics

Authors: S. T. Zolyan

Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russian Federation; Institute of Scientific Information on Social Sciences RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation; Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law NAS of the Republic of Armenia, Yerevan, Armenia

Abstract: The article develops the idea of Yu. S. Stepanov (1971) that meaning is not an exclusive property of sign systems used by man, and it is present in biosystems. We consider it as one of the specific forms of manifestation of autopoiesis, namely, establishing interconnections between two systems, one of which is used for the other, either a plane of expression or a plane of content. This specification concerning the genetic code has already been named as codopoiesis (M. Barbieri, 2012). We introduce the new term, “semiopoiesis”, since it relies upon sign systems in general. From this point of view, the genetic code’s evolution can be viewed as a process of semiopoiesis – semiosis in its emerging. The increasing complexity of the organization leads to the autonomy of information and semiotic principles. Semiopoiesis, a complex of recursive self-referential operations of a semiotic system, becomes a form of the bio-world's dynamic organization when categories of meaning and purpose appear and become defining in it.

Keywords: Yu. S. Stepanov, meaning, biosemiotics, genetic code, codopoiesis, semiopoiesis

Bibliography:

Barbieri M. A Short History of Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 2009, no. 2, p. 221–245. DOI 10.1007/s12304-009-9042-8

Barbieri M. Codepoiesis – the deep logic of life. Biosemiotics, 2012, no. 5 (3), p. 297–299.

Barbieri M. What is code biology? BioSystems, 2018, no. 164, p. 1–10.

Barbieri M. A general model on the origin of biological codes. BioSystems, 2019, no. 181, p. 11–19.

Chebanov S. V. “Biohermeneutics and hermeneutics of biology”. Semiotica, 1999, vol. 127, no. 1/4, p. 215–226.

Chebanov S. V. Na puti k semioticheski osoznavayemoy biologii: biosemiotika zameshchayet sinteticheskuyu teoriyu evolyutsii [On the way to a semiotically tecognised biology: biosemiotics replaces the synthetic theory of evolution]. In: Metod. Moskovskiy yezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin. Moscow, 2019, no. 9, p. 151–173. (in Russ.)

Collins F. S. The language of God. New York, Free Press, 2006.

Collins F. S. The language of life: DNA and the revolution in personalized medicine. New York, Harper-Collins, 2009.

Crick F. The genetic code: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Cold Spring Symposium on Quantitative Biology, 1966, no. 31, p. 3–9.

Crick F. Life Itself: Its Origin and Nature. London, Simon & Schuster, 1981, 192 p.

Crick F. Zhizn' kak ona yest': Yeye zarozhdeniye i sushchnost [Life as it is: Its origin and nature]. Transl. by Yu. V. Bogatyrev. Moscow, 2002, 160 p. (in Russ.)

Favareau D. The evolutionary history of biosemiotics. In: Barbieri M. (ed.). Introduction to Biosemiotics. Dordrecht, Springer, 2007, p. 1–67.

Feshchenko V. V., Koval O. V. Sotvoreniye znaka. Ocherki o lingvoestetike i semiotike iskusstva [Creation of a sign. Essays on linguoaesthetics and semiotics of art]. Moscow, 2014, 640 p. (in Russ.)

Gamow G. Possible Relation between Deoxyribonucleic Acid and Protein Structures. Nature, 1954, vol. 173, no. 4398, p. 318.

Ivanov Vyach. Vs. “Granitsy semiotiki”: voprosy k predvaritel'nomu obsuzhdeniyu [“Borders of semiotics”: questions for preliminary discussion]. In: Sovremennaya semiotika i gumanitarnyye nauki. Moscow, 2010, p. 31–50. (in Russ.)

Jacob F. The linguistic model in biology. In: Armstrong D., Schooneveld C. H. van. (eds.). Roman Jakobson: Echoes of his scholarship. Lisse, de Ridder, 1977, p. 186–192.

Jakobson R. Linguistics. Relationship between the science of language and other sciences. In: Unesco (ed.). Main trends of research in the social and human sciences. Part 1: Social sciences. Paris, The Hague: Mouton, 1970, p. 419–463.

Jakobson R. Yazyk i bessoznatel'noye [Language and the unconscious]. Transl. by K. Golubovich, D. Epifanova, D. Krotovoy, K. Chukhrukidze, V. Shevoroshkina; intr. by K. Golubovich, K. Chukhrukidze. Moscow, Gnozis, 1996, 248 p. (in Russ.)

Katz G. The Hypothesis of a Genetic Protolanguage: an Epistemological Investigation. Biosemiotics, 2008, no. 1, p. 57–73. DOI 10.1007/s12304-008-9005-5

Koonin E. V., Novozhilov A. S. Origin and evolution of the genetic code: the universal enigma. IUBMB Life, 2009, no. 61 (2), p. 99–111. DOI 10.1002/ iub.146

Koonin E. V., Novozhilov A. S. Origin and Evolution of the Universal Genetic Code. Annual Review of Genetics, 2017, no. 51, p. 45–62.

Kun A., Radvanyi A. The evolution of the genetic code: impasses and challenges. Biosystems, 2018, vol. 164, p. 217–225. DOI 10.1016/j.biosystems. 2017.10.006

Lotman Yu. M. Mozg – tekst – kul'tura – iskusstvennyy intellekt [Brain – text – culture – artificial intelligence]. In: Semiotika i informatika. Moscow, VINITI, 1981, iss. 17, p. 13–17. (in Russ.)

Marais К., Kull К. Biosemiotics and Translation Studies. In: Gambier Y., Doorslaer L. van. (eds.). Border Crossing: Translation Studies and Other Disciplines. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2016, p. 169–188.

Monod J. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology. Fontana, 1971.

Nöth W. Charles Sanders Pierce.Critique & Semiotics, 2001, iss. 3/4, p. 5– 32. (in Russ.)

Peirce C. S. Collected Papers. Eds. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, A. W. Burks. Cambridge, Harvard Uni. Press, 1931–1966.

Peirce C. S., Welby-Gregory V. (Lady Welby). Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between C. S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Ed. by Charles S. Hardwick with the assistance of James Cook. Bloomington and Indianapolis, IN, Indiana University Press, 1977, 201 p.

Ratner V. A. Geneticheskiy yazyk: Grammatika, predlozheniya, evolyutsiya [Grammar, sentences, evolution]. Genetika, 1993, no. 29, p. 709–719. (in Russ.)

Ratner V. A. Sravnitel'naya iyerarkhicheskaya struktura geneticheskogo yazyka [Comparative hierarchical structure of genetic language]. Genetika, 1993, no. 29, p. 720–739. (in Russ.)

Ratner V. A. Khronika velikogo otkrytiya: Idei i litsa [The Chronicle of the great discovery: Ideas and faces]. Priroda, 2000, no. 6, p. 22–30. (in Russ.)

Rothschild F. S. Laws of symbolic mediation in the dynamics of self and personality. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1962, vol. 96 (3), p. 774–784.

Stepanov Yu. S. Semiotika. [Semiotics]. Moscow, Nauka, 1971, 168 p. (in Russ.)

“Vivre et parler” : un débat entre François Jacob, Roman Jakobson, Claude Lévi-Strauss et Philippe L'Héritier, photocopié de Les Lettres françaises, février 1968, no. 1221–1222.

Zolyan S. T. Vnov' o sootnesennosti yazyka i geneticheskogo koda [Again about the correlation of language and genetic code]. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, 2016, no. 1, p. 114–132. (in Russ.)

Zolyan S. T. Geneticheskiy kod: grammatika, semantika evolyutsiya [Genetic code: grammar, semantics, evolution]. In: Metod. Moskovskiy yezhegodnik trudov iz obshchestvovedcheskikh distsiplin. Moscow, 2018, no. 8, p. 130–184. (in Russ.)

Zolyan S. From Matter to Form: the Evolution of the Genetic Code as Semio-Poiesis. Linguistic Frontiers, 2020. (in Russ.) DOI 10.2478/lf-2020-0009

Zolyan S. T., Zhdanov R. I. Genom kak informatsionno-semioticheskiy fenomen [The genome as an information-semiotic phenomenon]. Filosofiya nauki i tekhniki, 2018, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 88–102. (in Russ.)

Zolyan S. T., Zhdanov R. I. Genome as (hyper)text: From metaphor to theory. Semiotica, 2018, iss. 225, p 1–18. DOI 10.1515/sem-2016-0214