Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
ISSN 2307–1753 [16+]
Founder — Institute of Philology, SB RAS
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal
for specialists in philology and semiotics
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: The Meaning of Pluperfect: Lexical and Grammatical Semantics

Authors: T. E. Yanko

Institute of Linguistics RAS, Moscow, Russian Federation

Issue 1, 2021Pages 145-158
UDK: 81.139DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2021-1-145-158

Abstract: The paper is aimed at the analysis of expressing the meaning ‘long ago’ or the meaning of pluperfect. In the meaning of ‘long ago’ the Russian word davno is the focus of a sentence. Meanwhile, if an event began long ago and is taking place at the time of reference (for instance, at the moment of speech), such context does not require davno to function as the focus. At present, the hypothesis was verified on the spoken corpora material. The key to the analysis is the prosody of the focus. On the whole, the hypothesis appeared to be true. At the same time, it acquired some substantial corrections. If earlier it was presumed that the context of pluperfect arises from the combination of davno and the aspectual forms of a verb, at present, the corpus analysis has revealed the third factor: it is the lexical semantics of the verb. The corpus analysis shows that the verbs of information transfer and the verbs in the negative can recover the connection of the past events with the point of reference. This meaning, in its turn, can cause the loss of the invariable focal function of davno in the context of the general factual in the past.

Keywords: pluperfect, focus, prosody, corpus analysis, spoken corpora, Russian language

Bibliography:

Apresyan Yu. D. Glagoly momental'nogo dejstviya i performativy v russkom yazyke [Verbs of momentary action in the Russian language]. In: Rusistika segodnya. Yazyk: sistema i ee funkcionirovanie [Russian languages studies today. Language: system and its functioning]. Moscow, Nauka, 1988, p. 57–78. (in Russ.)

Boguslavsky I. M. Sfera deystviya leksicheskikh edinits [Sphere of action of lexical units]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1996. (in Russ.)

Bryzgunova T. V. Intonatsiya [Intonation]. In: Russkaya grammatika [Russian grammar]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982, vol. 1, p. 96–122. (in Russ.)

Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Neskol'ko zamechaniy o slovakh tipa neskol'ko [Some comments on the words like neskol'ko]. In: Yazyk: sistema i funktsionirovanie [Language: system and function]. Moscow, Yazyki russkoy kul'tury, 1988, p. 44–54. (in Russ.)

Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Yazykovaja kontseptualizatsiya mira (na materiale russkoy grammatiki) [Linguistic conceptualization of the world (based on Russian grammar)]. Moscow, Yazyki slav'anskoy kul'tury, 1997. (in Russ.)

Glovinskaja M. Ya. Semanticheskie tipy vidovogo protivopostavleniya russkogo glagola [Semantic types of oppositions in the Russian verbs]. Moscow, Nauka, 1982. (in Russ.)

Kovtunova I. I. Sovremennyy russkiy yazyk. Poryadok slov i aktual'noe chlenenie predlozheniya [Modern Russian language. Word order and actual division of the sentence]. Moscow, Prosveshhenie, 1976. (in Russ.)

Paducheva E. V. K intonatsionnoy transkriptsii dlya predlozheniy proizvol'noy sintaksicheskoy slozhnosti [On the intonation transcription for the sentences with arbitrary syntactic complexity]. In: Voprosy kibernetiki. Semioticheskie issledovaniya [Issues of Cybernetics. Semiotic Studies]. Moscow, Nauchnyj sovet po kompleksnoj probleme “Kibernetika”, 1989, p. 18–29. (in Russ.)

Paducheva E. V. O semantike sintaksisa. [On the semantics of syntax]. Moscow, Nauka, 1974. (in Russ.)

Paducheva E. V. Davno i dolgo. In: Logicheskiy analiz yazyka: Yazyk i vremya. Moscow, Indrik, 1997. (in Russ.)

Sichinava D. V. Tipologiya plyuskvamperfekta. Slavyanskiy plyuskvamperfekt [The typology of pluperfect. Slavic pluperfect] Moscow, AST-Press Kniga, 2013. (in Russ.)

Shoshitayshvili I. A. Funktsii i status plyuskvamperfekta v glagol'noy sisteme [Functions and status of pluperfect in the verb system]. Doctoral thesis. Moscow, RGGU, 1998. (in Russ.)

Yanko T. E. Ispol'zovanie korpusnogo materiala pri analize kommunikativnykh funktsiy leksem redko i malo [The use of corpus in the analysis of communicative functions of lexemes redko and malo]. Voprosy filologii [Issues in Philology], 2014, no. 3–4 (48), p. 60–68 (in Russ.)

Yаnko T. E. Kommunikаtivnye strаtegii russkoy rechi [The communicаtive strаtegies of the Russiаn speech]. Moscow, Yаzyki slаvyаnskoi kul’tury Publ., 2001. (in Russ.)

Comrie B. Aspect: an introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge, CUP, 1976.

Comrie B. Tense. Cambridge, CUP, 1985.

Reichenbach H. Elements of Symbolic Logic, New York, McMillan, 1947.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology