Article

Name: Chekhov’s Plays as the Basis of Metatheatral Performances in the 2010s

Authors: O. N. Kuptsova, E. K. Sozina

Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation; State Institute of Art Studies, Moscow, Russian Federation; Institute of History and Archaeology UB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation; Ural Federal University, Russian Federation

Abstract: Chekhov’s drama has retained its constant popularity throughout the twentieth century and the first two decades of the twenty-first century and has an unbroken scenic history. In modern theater it performs several functions: 1) of a literary basis for the-atrical action, carefully preserved by the director (traditionalist approach); 2) of a kind of material that can and should be adapted, modernized, adjusted to the urgent range of acute problems and to today’s scenic language (avant-garde, post-dramatic approach). One might argue that Chekhov’s drama transitions into the category of “proto-text” or “metatext”. Productions of Chekhov’s plays are often the ones that become the realm of the most radical theatrical experiments when their “familiar” “proto-text”, their basis and foundation are, so to speak, factored out from them: his drama remains in the domain of literature, of reader’s attention while the theater moves ahead – into the area of new scenic opportunities which are only tangentially

Keywords: Anton Chekhov, drama, prototext, metatext, theater productions, modern theater, theater Director

Bibliography:

Dzhurova T. Apokalipsis mass [Apocalypse of the masses]. Peterburgskiy teatral’nyy zhurnal [Petersburg theater magazine], 2010, no. 1 (59). (in Russ.) URL: http://ptj.spb.ru/archive/59/director-school-59/vishnevyj-sad-3/.

Lehmann H.-Th. Postdramatisches Theater. Verlag der Autoren, Frankfurt am Main, 1999, 510 p. (Russ. ed.: Leman Kh.-T. Postdramaticheskiy teatr. Moscow, ADCdesign, 2013, 311 p.)

Maryakhina E. A. Smysloobrazuyushchie funktsii khudozhestvennoy detali: variativnost’ rezhisserskikh prochteniy [Meaning-forming functions of artistic detail: variability of Director’s readings]. Master’s Thesis. Moscow, Russian State University for the Humanities, 2020, 204 p. (in Russ.)

“Po tu storonu zanavesa”. Spektakl’ Andriya Zholdaka, programma spektaklya [“On the other side of the curtain”. Performance by Andriy Zholdak]. Performance program. St. Petersburg, Alexandrinsky theater, 2016, 4 p. (in Russ.)

Ryabin A., Korolek B. (ed.). Peter Eötvös. Tri sestry: opera v trekh posledovatel’nostyakh [Peter Eötvös. Three sisters: Opera in three sequences]. Ekaterinburg, Ural. Opera. Balet, 2019, 150 p. (in Russ.)

Sinitskaya A. Metadrama [Metadrama]. In: Lavlinskiy S., Mnikh L. (eds.). Eksperimental’nyy slovar’ noveyshey dramaturgii [Experimental dictionary of modern drama obshch]. Siedlce, IKRiBL, 2019, p. 160–170. (in Russ.)

Sukhikh I. N. Problemy poetiki Chekhova [Problems of Chekhov’s poetics]. St. Petersburg, Faculty of Philology, Saint Petersburg University, 2007, 492 p. (in Russ.)

Tarshis N. Nasha sakura [Our Sakura]. Peterburgskiy teatral’nyy zhurnal [Petersburg theater magazine], 2010, no. 1 (59). (in Russ.) URL: http://ptj. spb.ru/archive/59/director-school-59/vishnevyj-sad-3/.

Shcherbakova N. G. Ritual’nost’ kak element v teatral’noy estetike Nikolaya Kolyady [Ritualism as an element in the theatrical aesthetics of Nikolai Kolyada]. Theatron, 2013, no. 1 (11), p. 77–85. (in Russ.)