Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
ISSN 2307–1753 [16+]
Founder — Institute of Philology, SB RAS
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal
for specialists in philology and semiotics
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Continuous Reframing: G. Lakoff, Cognitive Linguistics, and ‘Language Poetry’

Authors: Vladimir V. Feshchenko

Institute of Linguistics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russian Federation

Issue 2, 2022Pages 9-17
UDK: 81-11; 82-1/9DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2022-2-9-17

Abstract: The article is devoted to a little-known episode of direct contacts between modern linguistics and experimental poetry. In the 1980s, the era of the so-called “linguistics wars” in the USA, that took place between representatives of generative grammar and cognitive semantics, “poetic wars” unfolded, one of the sides of which were the poets of the “language school”. G. Lakoff published a number of polemical articles in which he discusses the value of the “language movement” in poetry and its prox-imity to the strategies of cognitive linguistics. In particular, the focus is on the issue of “framing” knowledge in language. “Language poets” and cognitive linguists have in common not only their attention to metaphor as an operator of thinking, but also to language as a mediator between cognition and aesthesis, between experience and consciousness, between the poetic and metalinguistic functions of language.

Keywords: “language poetry”, cognitive linguistics, frames, language experiment

Bibliography:

Feshchenko V. V. Ispytatel'naya semiotika Ch. Bernsteina. Poeziya yazyka mezhdu russkoy i amerikanskoy traditsiyami [Charles Bernstein’s Experimental Semiotics. Language Poetry Between Russian and American Traditions]. NLO, 2021, no. 2, pp. 180–199. (in Russ.)

Feshchenko V. V. From the History of Cognitive Linguistic Approaches in Russian and Western-European Poetics. Critique and Semiotics, 2019, no. 2, pp. 128–135. (in Russ.) DOI 10.25205/2307-1737-2019-2-128-135

Harris R. A. The Linguistics Wars. Oxford, OUP, 1993.

Hejinian L. Barbarism. NLO, 2012, no. 1. URL: https://magazines.gorky. media/nlo/2012/1/varvarstvo.html Lakoff G. Continuous Reframing. Poetics Journal, 1982, no. 1 (1), pp. 68–73.

Lakoff G. On Whose Authority? Poetry Flash, 1985, no. 147, June, pp. 5–7.

Lakoff G., Turner M. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Met-aphor. Chicago, Uni. of Chicago Press, 1989.

Perelman B. Words Detached from the Old Song and Dance. In: Code of Signals: Recent Writings in Poetics, ed. Michael Palmer. Berkeley, North Atlan-tic Books, 1983, pp. 68–79.

Samostienko (Suslova) E. Vnutrennie interfeysy yazyka: pis'mo kak kogni- tivnaya tekhnologiya [Internal Language Interfaces: Writing as a Cognitive Technology]. NLO, 2021, no. 1. (in Russ.) URL: https://www.nlobooks.ru/ magazines/novoe_literaturnoe_obozrenie/167_nlo_1_2021/article/23153/

Tsur R. Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam, New York, North-Holland, 1992.

Watten B. The Turn to Language and the 1960s. Critical Inquiry, 2002, no. 29, pp. 139–183.

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology