Article

Name: Poetry translation as a specific discursive practice (based on the Russian translations of contemporary English poetry)

Authors: M. A. Tarasova

Institute of Linguistics of the RAS

Abstract: The article reveals the typological features of the language of translated poetry in comparison with the language of original poetry, the language of advertising and the media, addresses a number of language options, allowing to highlight this class of texts as a special discursive practice. The most important of them is the ability of modern translated poetic texts to reflect the potentiality of the receiving language. The translations of modern poetry is characterized by a high concentration of potential words and forms. It is also detected such important features of translated poetry texts as a lack of borrowed linguistic elements (lexemes, morphemes, etc.) and a small number of occasional forms. In modern translated poetry works conscious mechanism of the potentiation effect, aiming at the exclusive use of funds of the receiving language and implementing new word forms, developing resources inherent in language system. Modern translated poetry is a particular discursive practice in which the most evidently realizes phenomenon of potentiality, conditioned by linguistic factors, as well as specific model of addressing on the verge of normal communication and poetic autocommunication.

Keywords: discursive practice, translation, poetic language, potentiality, occasionalism

Bibliography:

Azarova N. M. Konvergencija filosofskogo i pojeticheskogo tekstov XX– XXI vekov: Diss. … d-ra filol. nauk. M., 2010. 852 s.

Azarova N. M. Kriterij «adresat» v ustanovlenii granic pojeticheskogo diskursa // Logicheskij analiz jazyka. Adresacija diskursa. M.: Indrik, 2012. S. 225–233.

Alekseev M. E. Perevod Biblii kak faktor sohranenija i razvitija jazykov narodov Rossii // Perevod Biblii kak faktor sohranenija i razvitija jazykov narodov RF i SNG: Materialy konf. M., 2008. S. 13–19.

Alpatov V. M. Anglijskij by vyuchil tol'ko za to… // Rodina. 2007. № 9. S. 21–23.

Valgina N. S. Aktivnye processy v sovremennom russkom jazyke. M.: Logos, 2003. 304 s.

Vinogradova V. N. Stilisticheskij aspekt russkogo slovoobrazovanija. M.: URSS, 2011. 184 s.

Goncharenko S. F. Pojeticheskij perevod i perevod pojezii: konstanty i variativnost' // Tetradi perevodchika. 1999. Vyp. 24. S. 107–122.

Efremova T. F. Tolkovyj slovar' slovoobrazovatel'nyh edinic russkogo jazyka. M.: Astrel', 2005. 636 s.

Kade O. Problemy perevoda v svete teorii kommunikacii // Voprosy teorii perevoda v zarubezhnoj lingvistike. M.: Mezhdunarodnye otnoshenija, 1978. S. 69–90.

Komissarov V. N. K voprosu o sopostavitel'nom izuchenii perevodov // Tetradi perevodchika. 1970. Vyp. 7. S. 46–50.

Krysin L. P. Slovo v sovremennyh tekstah i slovarjah: Ocherki o russkoj leksike i leksikografii. M.: Znak, 2008. 320 s.

Radbil' T. B. Jazykovye anomalii v hudozhestvennom tekste: Andrej Platonov i drugie. M.: Flinta, 2012. 322 s.

Revzina O. G. Sistemno-funkcional'nyj podhod v lingvisticheskoj pojetike i problemy opisanija pojeticheskogo idiolekta: Diss. v forme na-uch. dokl. ... d-ra filol. nauk. M., 1998. 86 s.

Remchukova E. N. Kreativnyj potencial russkoj grammatiki (morfologicheskie resursy jazyka): Diss. … d-ra filol. nauk. M., 2005.

Sokolova O. V. Tipologija diskursov aktivnogo vozdejstvija: pojeticheskij avangard, reklama i PR. M.: Gnozis, 2014. 304 s.

Superanskaja A. V. Russkij jazyk nachala XXI veka // Zhurnalistika i kul'tura russkoj rechi. 2007. № 3. S. 4–17.

Tynjanov Ju. N. Problema stihotvornogo jazyka // Tynjanov Ju. N. Literaturnyj fakt. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1993. S. 23–121.

Fateeva N. A. Predislovie ko vtoromu izdaniju knigi G. O. Vinokura «Majakovskij – novator jazyka». M.: URSS, 2006.