|
||||||||
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal for specialists in philology and semiotics |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Digital Fuzziness or das Ungefähre The Semiotics of Cultural Practices in the Digital Realm Authors: J. Krasni UNIVERSITY OF NIŠ
Abstract: This paper reflects on the fuzzy relation between representational practices in the digital realm, the meaning which emerges out of them and their role in digital discourses. The media practices acquired by the media users impact significantly on interpersonal online discourses. The users are, however, only vaguely aware of the semiotic systems and the culture(s) they (re)create. Various forms of approximate knowledge can be identified when analysing the recurring patterns od practices in different contexts. They show how content related meaning making processes intertwine with both the media format and its distributional infrastructures. The theoretical concept of approximate knowledge (das Ungefähre) will be exemplified with three formats of online multimodal discourses. The digital fuzzy practices encompass the relation between the distributed media content and user generated content (UGC) which share the same means of production, similar dissemination infrastructure and aesthetic standards. This relation represents the basic thread of the discursive mass production of sense in the online realm, which is based on approximate knowledge and fuzzy discursive production by the users. This content in its flow represents series of actions within the discourse, and it cannot be analysed outside of the technical infrastructure which it needs in order to exist. Keywords: multimodal discourse, online media apparatus, semiotics of digital realms, approximate knowledge, cultural practices Bibliography: Agamben, Giorgio (2009): What is an Apparatus? And Other Essays. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Angermuller, Johannes (2014): Poststructuralist Discourse Analysis. Subjectivity in Enunciative Pragmatics. Basingstoke, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan. Angermüller, Johannes (2007a): „Diskurs als Aussage und Äußerung. Die enunziative Dimension in den Diskurstheorien Michel Foucaults und Jacques Lacans.“ In: Ingo Warnke (Hrsg.): Diskurslinguistik nach Foucault. Theorie und Gegenstände. Berlin, New York: de Gruyter, S. 53–80. Arnheim, Rudolf (1996 [1972]): Anschauliches Denken. Zur Einheit von Bild und Begriff. Köln: DuMont. Assmann, Alleida (2006): „The Printing Press and the Internet: From A Culture Of Memory To A Culture Of Attention.“ In: Natascha Gentz und Stefan Kramer (Hrsg.) Globalization, Cultural Identities, and Media Representations. Albany: State of New York Press, S. 11–23. Baetens, Jan; Surdiacourt, Steven (2011): „How to ‚Read’ Images with Texts: The Graphic Novel Case.“ In: Eric Margolis und Luc Pauwels (Hrsg.): The Sage Handbook of Visual Research Methods. London: Sage, S. 590–600. Bernstein, Basil (1990): The Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse. London: Routledge. Boyd-Barrett, Oliver (2010): „Assessing the prospects for an Asian re-configuration of the global news order.” In: Global Media and Communication 6, S. 346–356. Delorme, Stéphane and Tessé, Jean-Philippe (2010): Éléments d’autocritique (ou comment j’ai raté la séance d’Avatar) entretien avec Zlavoj Žižek. In: Cahiers du Cinema, nr. 655, April 2010. Ducrot, Oswald (1984): Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit. Foucault, Michel (1980): “The Confession of the Flesh” (1977), interview. In: Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977 (ed. Colin Gordon), London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. pp. 194–228. Giesecke, Michael (2002): Von den Mythen der Buchkultur zu den Visionen der Informationsgesellschaft, Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp. Herman, David (2009): Basic Elements of Narrative. Oxford: Wiley- Blackwell. Knox, John (2007): „Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper home pages.” In: Visual Communication 6, S. 19–53. Knox, John (2009): „Punctuating the home page: image as language in an online newspaper.” In: Discourse & Communication 3, S. 145–172. Kramer, Stefan (2004): Vom Eigenen und Fremden: Fernsehen und kulturelles Selbstverständnis in der Volksrepublik China. Bielefeld: transcript. Kramer, Stefan; Ludes, Peter (2010): Networks of Culture: The World Language of Key Visuals. Berlin: Lit. Krasni, Jan (2014): „Re-Bombing in Memento. Traumata of Coventry, Belgrade and Dresden in Multimodal Collective Memory.” In: Arianna Maiorani, Christine Christie (Hrsg.): Multimodal Epistemologies. Towards an Integrated Framework, London: Routledge, S. 131–144. Krasni, Jan (2017a): Schuld und Krise. Bonuszahlungen und Verantwortung in Mediendarstellungen der Finanzkrise. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag. Krasni, Jan (2017b): Soziosemiotik und Diskurspolyphonie. Polyphone Positionierungspraktiken in den multimodalen online-Textformaten. In: Ernest W. B. Hess-Lüttich, Heidrun Kämpers, Martin Reisigl und Ingo Warnke (Eds.) Diskurs-Semiotisch: Aspekte multigormaler Diskurskodierung. De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin/Boeston, pp. 311–338. Kress, Gunther; van Leeuwen, Theo (2006[1996]): Reading Images: A Grammar of Visual Design. London: RoutledgeKrasni, Jan (2015): Reflecting on a Gap Between Polyphony and Multimodality in Online Media Formats. In: Janina Wildfeuer (Ed.): Building Bridges for Multimodal Research. International Perspectives on Theories and Practices of Multimodal Analysis. Bern: Peter Lang. Ludes, Peter (2001): Multimedia und Multi-Moderne: Schlüsselbilder: Fernsehnachrichten und World Wide Web – Medienzivilisierung in der Europäischen Währungsunion. (mit CD-Rom). Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag. Machin, David (2004): „Building the World’s Visual Language: The Increasing Global Importance of Image Banks in Corporate Media.” In: Visual Communication 3, S. 316–336. Machin, David; van Leeuwen, Theo (2007): Global Media Discourse: a Critical Introduction. Routledge, London; New York. Maingueneau, Dominique (2017): The Heterogeneity of Discourse: Expanding the Field of Discourse Analysis. In: Palgrave Communications 4. July 2017. DOI: 10.1057/palcomms.2017.58. Manovich, Lev (2002): The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press. Paech, Joachim (2003): „Überlegungen zum Dispositiv als Theorie medialer Topik“. In: Franz-Josef Albersmeier (Hg.): Texte zur Theorie des Films, Stuttgart: Reclam Verlag, pp. 465–498. Pêcheux, Michel (1982): Language, Semantics, and Ideology. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Ryan, Marie-Laure (2007): „Toward a Definition of Narrative.” In: David Herman (Ed.): The Cambridge Companion to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, S. 22–35. Schnädelbach, Herbert (2002): Erkenntnistheorie zur Einführung. Hamburg: Junius. Schleichkorn, Henry (2007): Stock Photography. In: Michael Peres (Ed.): Focal Encyclopedia of Photography. 4th Edition. Burlington-Amsterdam: Elsevier/ Focal Press pp.350-353. Shifman, Limor (2014): Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press. Surdiacourt, Steven (2012): Tying Ends Together: Surface and Storyworld in Comics. In: Comics Forum: https://comicsforum.org/2012/12/27/image-narrative- 8-tying-ends-together-surface-and-storyworld-in-comics-by-steven-surdiacourt/. Retrieved on 15.10.2017. Thussu, Daya Kishan (2007): Media on the Move: Global Flow and Contra- Flow. London: Routledge. Thussu, Daya Kishan (2003): „Live TV and Bloodless Deaths: War, Infotainment and 24/7 News.” In: Daya Thussu, Dess Freedman (Hrsg.): War and the Media: Reporting Conflict 24/7. London, Thousand Oaks: Sage, S. 117–133. |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |