Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
ISSN 2307–1753 [16+]
Founder — Institute of Philology, SB RAS
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal
for specialists in philology and semiotics
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Conceptual Field of the Impossible in A. P. Chekhov’s Short Stories “Dreams” and “Happiness”

Authors: L. N. Sinyakova

Novosibirsk State University

Issue 2, 2018Pages 300-309
UDK: 82-3DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2018-2-300-309

Abstract: The article examines conceptual field of the Impossible in A. P. Chekhov’s two short stories, “Dreams” (1886) and “Happiness” (1887), which are arranged by the common plot. Conceptual representations of happenings are quite opposite in these stories. The characters dream of something impossible to get some psychological revival in bright dreams. But returning to reality is a deeply disgusting trial to them. In the 1st short story, “Dreams”, two village policemen follows the tramp to the city court. Exile in Siberia seems to him to be the greatest luck. Ontological and anthropological appearance of the main hero is miserable, but dreaming of the better life in Siberia changes him essentially. He wants to own a little piece of land, to build a house for his future family and to overcome any difficulties. The trump’s description of Siberian spaces involves his two followers into the process of dreaming. They dream of faraway freedom, because they suddenly realize they are chained in their duties and bored by monotonous life they lead on. Conceptual opposition of the short story is the Impossible / the Inevitable. Other variants of this main opposition are: Freedom / Necessity, rich Siberian Nature / poor autumn landscape, Sunny weather there / cloudy darkness here, and, at last, a Strong Man there / a Weak Man here, in the narrated situation and in actual lifetime in general. In the 2nd story two old men, the shepherd and his acquaintance, are talking about treasures hidden under their feet in the ancient ground of South Russia. And while they are discussing how could they get the hoard, the young shepherd, one more hero of the story, thinks over what is happiness itself. He comes to conclusion that happiness is something correlated with old age and illness. So, two positions are revealed in interpretation of the basic concept HAPPINESS inside the conceptual structure of the investigated text: treasures and material comfort, on one hand, and some excessive idea, on another. Then the description of endless landscape widens the area of narrated story. Happiness imagined by the old men seems to be eliminated in comparison with this vision. It means that the true existence values are out of things that two old men consider to be happiness. The process of living itself is much more valuable in the author’s outlook, than any treasures. There reveals two pairs of oppositions in this short story: HAPPINESS in TREASURES / HAPPINESS in VITALITY. The narrator’s vision in the later short story spreads over everywhere. It means, in fact, the author’s creation of sense of endless variability of life.

Keywords: conceptual field, freedom, scope, happiness, riches, vitality

Bibliography:

Chekhov A. P. Polnoye sobranie sochinenii i pisem [Compete Collected Works and Letters]. In 30 vols. Soch.: In 18 vols. Moscow, Nauka, 1984, vol. 5, 703 p.; 1985, vol. 6, 735 p. (in Russ.)

Dal V. I. Tolkovyi slovar zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka [Russian Vocabulary]: In 4 vols. Moscow, AST: Astrel: Tranzitkniga, 2006, vol. 1, 1158 p. (in Russ.)

Efremova T. F. Novyi slovar russkogo yazyka. Tolkovo-slovoobrazovatelnyi [The New Russian Vocabulary. Explanatory And Grammatical]. Moscow, Russkiy yazyk, 2000, 1209 p. URL: http://www.efremova.info (accessed 06.12.2017). (in Russ.)

Fraize N. Proza Antona Chekhova [Die Prosa Anton Cechovs]. Transl. from German. Moscow, Flinta: Naukа, 2012, 376 p. (In Russ.)

Shmid V. Proza kak poeziya. Pushkin. Dostoevskiy. Chekhov. Avagard. [Prose as Poetry. Pushkin. Dostoyevsky. Chekhov. Avant-guard]. St. Petersburg, Inapress, 1998, 352 p. (in Russ.)

Tamarchenko N. D. Syuzhet ispytaniya: opyt tipologii (na materiale russkoy povesti Sеrebryanogo veka) [The Treatment Plot: Typologic Study (On Russian Story of Silver Age). Novyi filologicheskiy Vestnik, 2006, no. 2, p. 243–247. (in Russ.)

Tyupa V. I. Khudozhestvennost chekhovskogo rasskaza [Art and Poetics of Checkhov’s Short Stories]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1989, 135 p. (in Russ.)

Zhivolupova N. V. Dostoyevskiy i Chekhov: aspekty arkhitektoniki i poetiki. [Dostoyevsky and Chekhov: Aspects of Archytectonics and Poetics]. Nizhniy Novgorod, Dyatlovy gory, 2017, 268 p. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology