Article

Name: Metacommunication in Plays by N. F. Simpson, D. Campton, and J. Saunders

Authors: P. E. Zhilichev

Institute of Philology SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)

Abstract: This paper deals with the problem of metacommunication in dramatic discourse. Following the approaches of Slawomir Świontek, Patrice Pavis, Hans-Thies Lehmann and others, it discusses the ways of compensating the lack of a single mediating figure in drama. This analysis employs the concept of “semiotic profanation of a symbol” developed by Yuri Shatin. The investigation is based on several English plays that embody the poetics of theatrical absurd. Norman Frederic (“N. F.”) Simpson’s plays A Resounding Tinkle (1957) and The Hole (1958) both make extensive use of such characters as authors, critics, actors, visionaries. Characters are familiar with established interpretative models (Bergson's theory or modernist visionary poetics), even applying those models to their own actions. David Campton’s play Us and Them (1972) and James Saunders’ play Over the Wall (1977) utilize mediating figures such as the Recorder and the Narrator. While both works present themselves as parable plays, the inclusion of narrative instances does not streamline the perception of aesthetic signs. Instead, it attracts the recipient’s attention to the dual nature of drama as a media (a text for reading and a part of a theatrical performance). In addition, all four plays tend to deconstruct traditional cultural signs such as the wall, the hole / abyss, the veil, etc. The paradoxal situation of being forcedly freed from established patterns of interpretation awakens the addressee’s receptive potential.

Keywords: dramatic discourse, metacommunication, metatheatre, theatre of the absurd, N.F. Simpson, James Saunders, David Campton

Bibliography:

Babikov A. “Sobytie” i samoe glavnoe v dramaticheskoy kontseptsii V. V. Nabokova [“Event” and the Essence of V. Nabokov’s Views on Drama]. In: V. V. Nabokov: Pro et contra. St. Petersburg, RHGA Publ., 2001, vol. 2, p. 558–586. (in Russ.)

Bergson H. Laughter: An Essay on the Meaning of the Comic. New York, Macmillan, 1911, 237 p. (Russ. ed.: Bergson A. Smekh. Moscow, Iskusstvo Publ., 1992, 127 p.)

Campton D. “Us and Them.” In: Shackleton M. (ed.) Double Act: Ten One-Act Plays on Five Themes. London, Edward Arnold, 1985, p. 70–85.

Chakare V. O. Paradoks v tvorchestve B Biena, H. Pintera, N. F. Simpsona [Paradox in Works by B. Behan, H. Pinter, and N. F. Simpson]: Cand. of Philol. Diss. Leningrad, 1988, 149 p. (in Russ.)

Elam K. The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. London; New York, Routledge, 1980, 163 p.

Esslin M. The Theatre of the Absurd. Garden City/New York, Doubleday, 1961, 364 p. (Russ. ed.: Esslin M. Teatr absurda. St. Petersburg, Baltic Seasons Publ., 2010, 528 p.)

Hingley R. Hadrian's Wall: A Life. Oxford, Oxford UP, 2012, 416 p.

Huysmans J.-K. À rebours. Paris, Georges Crès, 1922. 296 p. (Russ. ed. Gyuismans Zh.-K. Naoborot. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1995, 232 p.)

Kondakov D. A. Tvorchestvo Ezhena Ionesko v kontekste ideyno-khudozhestvennykh iskaniy evropeyskoy literatury XX veka [Eugene Ionesco’s Works in the Context of Search for Ideas and Aesthetics in European Literature of 20 th Century]. Novopolotsk, PSU Publ., 2008, 157 p. (in Russ.)

Lehmann H.-T. Postdramatisches Theater. Frankfurt am Mein, Verlag der Autoren, 1999, 510 S. (Russ. ed: Leman H.-T. Postdramaticheskij teatr. Moscow, ABCdesign, 2013, 312 p.)

Matich O. Pokrovy Salomei: Eros, smert' i istoriya [The Veils of Salome: Eros, Death, and History]. In: Pavlova M. (ed.) Erotizm bez beregov [Boundless Eroticism]. Moscow, New Literary Observer Publ., 2004. (in Russ.)

Neginsky R. Salome: The Image of a Woman Who Never Was. Cambridge, Cambridge Scholars Publisher, 2013, 270 p. (Russ. ed.: Nezhinskaya R. Salomeya: obraz rokovoj zhenshhiny, kotoroj ne bylo. Moscow, New Literary Observer Publ., 2018. URL: https://www.litres.ru/rozina-nezhinskaya/salomeya-obraz- rokovoy-zhenschiny-kotoroy-ne-bylo/ (accessed 15.02.2020)).

Pavis P. Dictionnaire du théâtre: termes et concepts de l'analyse théâtrale. Paris, Editions sociales, 1980, 482 p. (Russ. ed. Pavi P. Slovar’ teatra. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991, 504 p.)

Pfister M. The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 1993, 339 p.

Saunders J. “Over the Wall.” In: Shackleton M. (ed.) Double Act: Ten One-Act Plays on Five Themes. London, Edward Arnold, 1985, p. 54–69.

Shatin Yu. Kontsept serdtse i jego khudozhestvennaja dekonstruktsija v russkoj poezii XX veka [The Concept of Heart and Its Artistic Deconstruction in Russian Poetry of the 20 th Century]. In: Critique and Semiotics, 2011, no. 15, p. 189–196. (in Russ.)

Simpson N. F. “The Hole.” In: Simpson N. F. The Hole, and other Plays and Sketches. London: Faber and Faber, 1964, p. 9–57.

Simpson N. F. A Resounding Tinkle: A Comedy. London, Faber and Faber, 1958, 75 p.

Stephenson J. (Transl.) Excerpts from Le Dialogue Dramatique et le Metathéâtre by Sławomir Świontek. Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism, 2006, vol. 21 (1), p. 129–144.

Welz J. The Ancient World of Shakespeare: Authenticity or Anachronism? A Retrospect. In: Alexander C. M. S. (ed.) The Cambridge Shakespeare Library. Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 2003, vol. 1: Shakespeare’s Times, Texts, and Stages, p. 93–104.

Zhou X. Salome in China: The Aesthetic Art of Dying. In: Bristou J. (ed.) Wilde Writings: Contextual Conditions. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2003, p. 295–318.