|
||||||||
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal for specialists in philology and semiotics |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: Stylization of Ornamental Narrative in the Prose of Denis Osokin. The Cycle of Stories “Angels and Revolution. Vyatka 1923” Authors: I. S. Poltoratsky Institute of Philology SB RAS (Novosibirsk, Russian Federation)
Abstract: The article analyzes the poetics of the short story cycle “Angels and Revolution. Viatka 1923” by modern Russian writer Denis Osokin. The author, developing the tradition of Russian ornamental prose of the 20 th century, creates a modern interpretation of revolutionary events. The fictional locus of Viatka 1923 becomes a space of the artistic experiment for language renewal. Using the technique of stylization of the ornamental narrative, Denis Osokin forms the image of an impersonal narrator consisting of many narrative- rhetorical figures that weaken the fabulality of the narrative. The artistic integrity of the cycle is preserved by a system of style, intertextual, and motivational equivalences that create a special form of lyrical plot characteristic for ornamental prose. Keywords: ornamental prose, ornamental narrative, modern Russian literature, Denis Osokin Bibliography: Chigintseva T. A. Elementy stikha v tvorchestve D. Osokina. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Lingvistika, 2013, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 131–135. (in Russ.) Chigintseva T. A. Zagolovochno-final’nyj kompleks v knigah D. Osokina. Problemy istorii, filologii, kul’tury, 2016, no. 1, p. 131–135. (in Russ.) Chigintseva T. A. Vizual’no-stilevye osobennosti tekstov Denisa Osokina. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk. Samara, 2013. (in Russ.) Davydov D. M. Ot primitiva k primitivizmu i naoborot. Arion, 2000, no. 4, p. 81–95. (in Russ.) Eihenbaum B. M. Leskov i sovremennaya proza. In: Eihenbaum B. M. Literatura: Teoriya. Kritika. Polemika. Ltningrad, 1927, p. 210–225. (in Russ.) Eihenbaum B. M. Kak sdelana “Shinel” Gogolya. In: Poetika. Petrograd, 1919, p. 151–165. (in Russ.) Karbyshev A. A., Kulyapin A. I. Problema adresatsii i povestvuemogo mira v romanakh Sashi Sokolova. Izvestiya Altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2007, no. 2 (54), p. 61–66. (in Russ.) Leukhina A. V. Literaturnyj primitivizm: estetika i poetika. Avtoref. diss. kand. filol. nauk. Samara, 2010. (in Russ.) Lipovetskiy M. N. Eto kritika. Russkij zhurnal, 2004, iss. 23. URL: http:// old.russ.ru/columns/critic/20040212_krit-pr.html (accessed 23.11.2019). (in Russ.) Osokin D. S. Angely i revolyutsiya. Znamya, 2002, no. 4, p. 112–135. (in Russ.) Osokin D. Stalo byt’, ubiraem lyubuyu suetu. Iskusstvo kino, 2011, no. 1. URL: http://kinoart.ru/archive/2011/01/n1-article11 (accessed 23.11.2019). (in Russ.) Osokin D. S. Baryshni topolya. Moscow, 2003. (in Russ.) Osokin D. S. Nebesnye zheny lugovykh mari. Moscow, 2013. (in Russ.) Osokin D. S. Ovsyanki: Rasskazy, povest’. Moscow, 2011. (in Russ.) Shmid V. Narratologiya. Moscow, 2008. (in Russ.) Shklovskiy V. B. O Zoshchenko i bol'shoj literature. In: Mikhail Zoshchenko: stat’i i materialy. Leningrad, 1928, p. 15–25. (in Russ.) Shklovskiy V. B. Ornamental’naya proza. Andrej Belyj. In: Shklovskiy V. B. O teorii prozy. Moscow, 1929, p. 205–225. (in Russ.) Tynyanov Yu. N. Literaturnoe segodnya. Tynyanov Yu. N. Poetika. Istoriya literatury. Kino. Moscow, 1977. p. 150–166. (in Russ.) Vinogradov V. V. Problema skaza v stilistike. Vinogradov V. V. O yazyke khudozhestvennoj prozy. Moscow, 1980, p. 42–54. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |