Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
ISSN 2307–1753 [16+]
Founder — Institute of Philology, SB RAS
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal
for specialists in philology and semiotics
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: Creolized Texts of Old Tiflis (On the Example of Pirosmani, Elibekyan, Ayvazyan)

Authors: T. S. Simyan

Yerevan State University (Yerevan, Armenia)

Issue 2, 2020Pages 256-285
UDK: 392.8DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2020-2-256-285

Abstract:

The article is devoted to the visual and speech genres of Old Tiflis, which are revealed in the visual and verbal texts of famous artists N. Pirosmani, V. Elibekyan and Armenian writer A. Ayvazyan. The carnival spirit of Old Tiflis influenced the visual and verbal signs of the gastronomic infrastructure. The article is written by a semiotic, typological method, as well as an interdiscursive approach (painting, fiction). In addition, Bakhtin’s theory has become a metalanguage for identifying speech genres of urban space.

An empirical analysis of the material showed that Pirosmani's paintings were a vivid example of visual advertising and, in fact, were multichannel creolized texts. Only later, when the symbolic capital of Pirosmani increased, his paint- ings began to be perceived as glowing examples of primitivism. In other words, they were “connected” to global discourse, and their primary function was for- gotten. In the main function of the signage, the paintings were the products of demand of the gastronomic infrastructure of Old Tiflis: they depicted the frames “food”, “feast”, they were also visual menus of Tiflis gastropubs (dukhans).

The utilitarian demand for signs generated the brilliant paintings of Pirosmani, and at the same time, he became the author of urban space. This phenomenon is also affected in the literary discourse (A. Ayvazyan), in which two methods of modeling urban space are manifested. Firstly, the city is mod- eled in consciousness, expressed at the level of the signified (maps, sketches), and then embodied in life. That is how many cities of historical Armenia were built in diachronic point of view. Secondly, the painter (Pirosmani, Grigor – the hero of the story of Ayvazyan) painted and created in the city space (interior, exterior). The motives of his work were his own inner experiences.

The multilingualism of urban space created a demand for advertising signs in different languages. Since the “social bottom” did not possess the linguistic norm of the Russian language, in the eyes of native speakers the urban texts seemed ridiculous, perceived with humor. Similar texts are found in various artists of Old Tiflis (Pirosmani, Gudiashvili, Elibekyan ect.). The same thing appears in the art discourse (Ayvazyan), which gives examples of playing with names, with language (toasts of fun and burial), etc. In addition, an analysis of such a speech genre as toast revealed that it incorporates proverbs, sayings, and in the thematic plan, the following manifestations can be called: spell-wish, wish-curse, wish-criticism, etc. The presence of a similar speech genre and the revealing of the functioning of the toast showed that eating was comprehended by different wishes, and the thematic and syntagmatic analysis of toasts can become a tool for reconstructing the axiological system of Old Tiflis society (homeland, city, parents, children, sisters and brothers, uncles and aunts, etc.).

Keywords: advertising signs, visual signs, food, speech genres, toast, chants, slogans, kinto, tattoo

Bibliography:

Aivazyan A. S. Dolgaya, dolgaya, muchitel’naya zhizn’ Iudy. Rasskazy, esse. Erevan, Nairi Publ., 1996. (in Russ.)

Aivazyan A. S. Nasha pechal’ vokrug Kezho. Rasskazy. Erevan, Sovetakan grokh Publ., 1985. (in Russ.)

Aivazyan A. S. Вывески Тифлиса: Рассказы, повести. Erevan, Sovetakan grokh Publ., 1981. (in Russ.)

Aivazyan A. S. Kavkazskoe Esperanto. Povesti, hasskazy. Moscow, Sovetskii pisatel’ Publ., 1990. (in Russ.)

Anchabadze Yu. D., Volkova N. G. Stary Tbilisi. Gorod i gorozhane v XIX v. Moscow, Nauka, 1990, 272 p. (in Russ.)

Armyanskie khudozhniki v Gruzii: ot Akopa Bashindzhagyana do Gayane Khachatryan. Tbilisi, CEZANNE Ltd, 2011, 107 p. (in Russ.)

Bakhtin M. Avtor i geroy: k filosofskim osnovam gumanitarnykh nauk. St. Petersburg, Azbuka Publ., 2000. (in Russ.)

Dzutsova I. Tiflisskiy period Sergeya Sudeikina. Novye materialy so stranits uhezinskoi pechati 1920-kh godov. Novyi zhurnal, 2014, no. 277. URL: http:// magazines.russ.ru/nj/2014/277/17d.html#_edn6 (accessed 14.11.2019). (in Russ.)

Grishashvili I. Literaturnaya bogema Starogo Tbilisi. Tbilisi, Merany, 1977 [1928]. (in Russ.)

Kheily M. Vetry sud’by. Sbornik rasskazov. New York, 2010. (in Russ.)

Kuznetsov E. D. Vstupitel’naya stat’ya. In: Pirosmani. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow, Sovetskiy khudozhnik Publ., 1986. (in Russ.)

Pirosmani. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. Moscow, Sovetskiy khudozhnik Publ., 1986. (in Russ.)

Radashkevich A. Gruzinskie zametki. Sibirskie ogni, 2009, no. 9. (in Russ.) URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/sib/2009/9/ra14.html (accessed 14.11.2019).

Shafranskaya E. F. Kinto: zagadochnaya figura v russkikh tekstakh. Vestnik Tver State Uni. Series: Philology, 2016, no. 3m p. 300–308. (in Russ.)

Simyan T. S. Muzykal’noe i karnaval’noe prostranstvo Starogo Tiflisa (na primere tvorchestva Vano Khodzhabekyana, Vagarshaka Elibekyana, Agasi Aivazyana). ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki, 2019, no. 2, p. 63–80. (in Russ.)

Simyan T. S. Old Tiflis in the Memory of Different Generations: Painting, Cafe, Sunset of the City (By the Example of V. Elibekyan, A. Ayvazian). Syuzhetologiya i syuzhetografiya, 2019, no. 1, p. 256–276. (in Russ.)

Simyan T. S. Sergei Paradzhanov kak tekst: chelovek, gabitus, inter’er (na material vizual’nykh tekstov). ΠΡΑΞΗΜΑ. Problemy vizual’noi semiotiki, 2019, no. 3, p. 197–215. (in Russ.)

Stepanyan A. A., Simyan T. S. Erevan kak semioticheskii tekst (opyt reconstruktsii “nachala” i “kontsa” prospekta Mashtotsa. Critique & Semiotics, 2012, iss. 16, p. 6–16. (in Russ.)

Vagarshak Elibekyan. Intr. by G. Igityan, comp. by S. Manukyan. Erevan, Izobrazitel’noe iskusstvo Publ., 1991. (in Russ.)

Vezhbitsky N. Vstrechi s Eseninym. URL: http://esenin-lit.ru/esenin/vospominaniya/sovremenniki/verzhbickij-vstrechi-s-eseninym.htm (accessed 14.11.2019). (in Russ.)

Zdanevich K. Niko Pirosmanishvili. Tbilisi, Literatura i iskusstvo Publ., 1963. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology