Institute of Philology of the Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
ISSN 2307–1753 [16+]
Founder — Institute of Philology, SB RAS
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal
for specialists in philology and semiotics
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737
Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics)
По-русски
Archive
Submission requirements
Process for Submission and Publication
Editor′s office
Editorial Board and Editorial Council
Our ethical principles
Search:


Email: silantev@post.nsu.ru

Article

Name: The Symbolic Capital of Khlebnikov and Mayakovsky Versus Avant-Garde Performativity. Semiotic Pragmatics of Avant-Garde Behavior and Life Creation

Authors: Dennis Ioffe

Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium

Issue 1, 2022Pages 228-272
UDK: 8.80 + 8.82 + 7.01 + 7.03 + 7.04DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737-2022-1-228-272

Abstract:

Apart from offering a new glance upon the reasons of the “last personal conflict” between Mayakovsky and Khlebnikov, this paper explores the differences in “discursive recognition” of the two major Russian Futurist poets. These differences reflect the Soviet reception of two prominent symbolists: Andrei Bely and Alexander Blok. The “approved” symbolist Blok was preferable to the “controversial” and “bewildered” Bely, who was published less frequently. In a similar fashion, the “good” futurist Mayakovsky was in a much better position than the “problematic” Futurist Khlebnikov, who published almost nothing during the Soviet era. Our understanding of the posthumous legacy of these poets depends largely on what we can call “collective memory,” using the post-Durkheimian concept developed by the French philosopher Maurice Halbwachs (1877–1945). This concept differs from “individual memory” in that collective memory is shared, transmitted, and at the same time deliberately “constructed” by the people who make up the modern social habitus. Halbwachs' ideas were taken up by Jan Assmann with the concept of “communicative memory” (a collective memory based on everyday communication) and James E. Young, who introduced the concept of “collective memory”, advocating memory as initially fragmented, “selectively assembled” and, above all, specifically individualistic. This article defines the behavioral and publishing strategies of the authors in the context of the dominant Soviet social order, analyzing how they were accepted into the ever-changing Soviet “cultural memory”. The paper demonstrates several significant inconsistencies in each author's strategic maneuvers and dwells on the possible reasons for their successes and failures.

Keywords: Avant-Garde, Collective memory, Russian Futurism, Pragmatics of behaviour, Symbolic Capital, Mayakovsky, Khlebnikov

Bibliography:

Adolphs S. Corpus and Context: Investigating pragmatic functions in spo-ken discourse. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2008.

Akimova M. Eshche raz ob illyustratsiyakh: ieroglify tantsev V. Parnakha. In: Tsivyan T. V. et al. (eds.). Khudozhnik i ego tekst. Russkiy avangard: Istoriya, razvitie, znachenie. K 80-letiyu Vyach. Vs. Ivanova. Moscow, Nauka, 2011, pp. 32–52. (in Russ.)

Assmann J. Das kulturelle Geddchtnis. Schrift, Erinnerung und politische Identitdt in fruhen Hochkulturen. Munchen, Beck, 1992.

Austin J. How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Uni. Press, 1967.

Becker G. S. Human Capital. New York, Columbia Uni. Press, 1964.

Belaya G. Don Rikhoty 20-kh godov i gruppa Pereval. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’ Publ., 1989. (in Russ.)

Bobrinskaya E. Futuristicheskiy grim. In: Russkiy avangard: Granitsy iskusstva. Moscow, NLO, 2006, pp. 142–157. (in Russ.)

Bonhomme M. Pragmatique des figures du discours. Paris, Champion, 2005.

Bourdieu P. Esquisse d’une théorie de la pratique. Précédé de ‘Trois études d’ethnologie kabyle’. Geneve: Seuil, 1972.

Bourdieu P. Raisons pratiques. Sur la théorie de l’action. Paris, Seuil, 1994.

Bowlt J. Natalia Goncharova and Futurist Theater. In: Mansbach S. A. (ed.). From Leningrad to Ljubljana: The Suppressed Avant-Gardes of East Central and Eastern Europe During the Early Twentieth century. A special issue of Art Journal, 1990, no. 49. pp. 44–51.

Brown G. Speakers, Listeners, and communication: Explorations in dis-course analysis. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge Uni. Press, 1995.

Burlyuk M. “Nachalo bylo tak daleko”. In: Katanyan V. V. (ed.). Sovremennitsy o Mayakovskom. Moscow, Druzhba narodov Publ., 1993, pp. 45–49. (in Russ.)

Burton-Roberts N. (ed.). Pragmatics. New York, Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

Chatman S. Characters and narrators: Filter, Center, Slant and Interest-focus. Poetics Today, 1986, no. 7, pp. 189–204.

Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 1988, no. 94, pp. 95–120.

Cummings L. Pragmatics: A multidisciplinary Perspective. Edinburgh, Edinburgh Uni. Press, 2005.

DiGiovanna J. J. Linguistic phenomenology: Philosophical method in J. L. Austin. Bern, P. Lang, 1989.

Docherty Th. Reading the (absent) character: Towards a theory of characterization in fiction. Oxford, Oxford Uni. Press, 1983.

Fann K. T. Symposium on J. L. Austin. London, Routledge, 1969.

Goryaeva T. N. I. Khardzhiev i V. V. Mayakovsky. In: Arkhiv N. I. Khard-zhieva. Moscow, In Artibus, 2019, vol. 3, pp. 420–429. (in Russ.)

Greimann D., Siegwart G. (eds.). Truth and Speech acts: Studies in the Phi-losophy of Language. London, Routledge, 2007.

Grigoriev V. P. Mayakovsky v zerkale sud’by Khlebnikova. In: Budetlyanin. Moscow, 2000a, pp. 550–559. (in Russ.)

Grigoriev V. P. Poeziya, politika, politikanstvo. In: Budetlyanin. Moscow, 2000b, pp. 594–602. (in Russ.)

Grundy P. Doing Pragmatics. London, Hodder Education, 2008.

Halbwachs M. The Collective Memory. Trans. Francis J. Ditter, Jr., and Vida Yazdi Ditter. New York, Harper & Row, 1980.

Ilyukhina E. Maski Larionova i Goncharovoy. In: Kovalenko G. F. (ed.). Avangard i teatr 1910–1920 godov. Moscow, Nauka, 2008, pp. 357–402. (in Russ.)

Ioffe D. Budetlyanin na obochine islama. Philologica, 2003/2005, no. 8, pp. 217–258. (in Russ.)

Ioffe D. Ideologiya avangarda kak fenomen fantoma. Russian Literature, 2010, no. 67 (3), pp. 417–441. (in Russ.)

Ioffe D. K voprosu o smyslovom genezise verbal’no-telesnogo i vizual’nogo v russkom kontseptualizme. In: Ichin K. (ed.). Eto ne moskovskiykontseptualizm. Belgrad, Belgrad Uni. Press, 2021, pp. 248–265. (in Russ.)

Ioffe D. Modernism in the context of Russian ‘life-creation’. Observations on the theory of ‘life text’ sign systems with regard to the ‘lebenskunst’ phe-nomenon and its immediate comparative setting. New Zealand Slavonic Journal, 2006–2007, no. 40, pp. 22–56.

Ioffe D. Pragmatika i zhiznetvorchestvo (eshche raz o kontseptsii avangarda u M. I. Shapira). In: Sbornik statey pamyati M. I. Shapira. Amsterdam, Pegasus, 2014, pp. 487–507. (in Russ.)

Ioffe D. Russian and European modernism and the idea of life-creation. In: S. Brouwer (ed.). Dutch contributions to the Fourteenth International Con-gress of Slavists. Ohrid, September 10–16, 2008. Amsterdam, Rodopi, 2008a, pp. 151–170.

Ioffe D. The concept of the ‘text of behavior’ in the Moscow – Tartu school of semiotics. Amsterdam Journal for Cultural Narratology, 2007, no. 5.URL: http://cf.hum.uva.nl/narratology/ a07_loffe.htm (accessed 21.06.2011).

Ioffe D. Zhiznetvorchestvo russkogo modernizma sub specie semioticae. Critique and Semiotics, 2005, no. 8, pp. 126–179. (in Russ.)

Ioffe D. The Discourses of Love: Preliminary observations regarding Charles Baudelaire in the context of Bryusov’s and Blok’s vision of the ‘urban woman’. Russian Literature, 2008b, no. 64, pp. 19–47.

Ivanov V. Tri zhizni Borisa Glagolina. In: Kovalenko G. F. (ed.). Russkiy avangard i teatr, 1910–1920. Moscow, Nauka, 2008, pp. 4–19. (in Russ.)

Ivanova E. Chukovsky i Mayakovsky. In: Tvorchestvo V. V. Mayakovskogo. Moscow, 2014, iss. 2, pp. 164–197. (in Russ.)

Jakobson R. O. Iz Vospominaniy. O Velimire Khlebnikove. In: Mir Velimira Khlebnikova: Stat’i. Issledovaniya (1911–1998). Comp. by V. V. Ivanov, Z. S. Paperny, A. E. Parnis. Moscow,Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 2000, pp. 83–89. (in Russ.)

Jakobson R. Budetlyanin nauki: vospominaniya, pis’ma, stat’i, stikhi, proza. Ed. by B. Jangfeldt. Moscow, Gileya, 2012. (in Russ.)

Jangfeldt B. Roman Jacobson. Budetlyanin nauki: vospominaniya, pis’ma, stat’i, stikhi, proza. Comp., prep., intr. and comment. by B. Jangfeldt. Moscow, Gileya, 2012. (in Russ.)

Kallia A. Politeness and implicature: Expanding the cooperative principle. Hamburg: Verlag Kovac, 2007.

Katanyan V. Ne tol’ko vospominaniya. Russian Literature Triquarterly, 1975, no. 13, pp. 477–499. (in Russ.)

Khlebnikov V. Collection of works. In 6 vols. Moscow, Nasledie Publ., 2000, vol. 3. (in Russ.)

Khlebnikov V. Tvoreniya. M. Polyakov, V. P. Grigoriev, A. E. Parnis. Moscow, Sovetskiy pisatel’, 1986. (in Russ.)

Kovalenko G. F. (ed.). Russkiy avangard i teatr, 1910–1920. St. Petersburg, Dmitry Bulanin Publ., 2000. (in Russ.)

Kruchenykh Aleksey. Nash vekhod. Moscow, 1996. (in Russ.)

Larionov M., Zdanevich I. Pochemu my raskrashivaemsya. In: Terekhina V. (ed.). Russkiy Futurizm. Moscow, 1999, pp. 368–371. (in Russ.)

Lemaitre M. Le Theatre futuriste italien et russe. Paris, Centre de creativite, 1967.

Listengarten J. Russian tragifarce: Its cultural and political roots. Cranbury: Associated Uni. Presses, 2000.

Mann Yu. V. Zametki o “Neevklidovoy geometrii” Gogolya, ili “Sil’nye krizisy, chuvstvuemye tseloyu massoyu”. Voprosy literatury, 2002, no. 4, pp. 170–200. (in Russ.)

Margolin U. Characterization in narrative: Some theoretical prolegomena. Neophilologus, 1983, no. 67, pp. 1–15.

Margolin U. Introducing and sustaining characters in literary narrative: A set of conditions. Style, 1987, no. 21, pp. 107–124.

Margolin U. Structuralist approaches to character in narrative: The state of the art. Semiotica, 1989, no. 75, pp. 1–25.

Margolin U. The Doer and the Deed: Action as a Basis for Characterization in the Narrative. Poetics Today, 1986, no. 7, pp. 204–225.

Margolin U. The what, the when, and the how of being a character in literary narrative. Style, 1990, no. 24, pp. 453–468.

Markov V. Russian Futurism: A History. Berkley, California Uni. Press, 1968.

Martin R. M. Toward a Systematic Pragmatics. Westport, Greenwood Press, 1974.

Mayakovsky V. V. V. V. Khlebnikov. In: Mir Velimira Khlebnikova: Stat’i. Issledovaniya (1911–1998). Comp. by V. V. Ivanov, Z. S. Paperny, A. E. Parnis. Moscow,Yazyki russkoy kul’tury Publ., 2000, pp. 151–158. (in Russ.)

Mayakovsky Vladimir. V. Khlebnikov [Nekrolog]. Krasnaya nov’, 1922, no. 4, pp. 303–306. (in Russ.)

Mochulsky K. Krizis voobrazheniya. Moscow, Vodoley Publ., 1999. (in Russ.)

Paperno I., Grossman J. (eds.). Creating life: The aesthetic utopia of Russian Modernism. Paolo Alto: Stanford Uni. Press, 1994.

Paperny V. Iz nablyudeniy nad poetikoy Andreya Belogo. Slavyanovedenie, 1994, no. 3, pp. 38–45. (in Russ.)

Parnis A. Khlebnikov – Mayakovsky – Miturich: k istorii odnogo konflikta. Serbian Review of Slavic Studies, 2021, vol. 100, pp. 559–597. (in Russ.)

Parnis A. Esli by gnev ne zastilal glaza… Informprostranstvo, 2007, no. 5. (in Russ.) URL: http://informprostranstvo.ru/N5_2007/polemik_N5_2007.html

Parnis A. Iz istorii khlebnikovedeniya: Aksionov i Khlebnikov. In: Kleberg L., Semenenko A. (eds.). Aksionov and Environs. Stockholm, 2012, pp. 21–55. (in Russ.)

Parnis A. Khlebnikov – Mayakovsky – Miturich. K istorii odnogo konflikta. In: Ioffe D., White F. (eds.). The Many Lives of the Russian Avant-Garde. Nikolay Khardzhiev Legacy. Amsterdam, 2019, pp. 67–85. (in Russ.)

Parnis A. Velemir Khlebnikov: Moskva – Santalovo, Mai-Iyun’ 1922. Biblio-Globus, 2002, no. 6, pp. 14–16. (in Russ.)

Robinson D. Introducing Performative Pragmatics. New York, Routledge. 2006.

Rudnitsky K. Russian and Soviet theater, 1905–1932. Trans. from Russ. by Roxane Permar, ed. by Lesley Milne. London: Thames & Hudson, 2000.

Russell R. Russian Drama of the Revolutionary Period. Totowa, Barnes & Noble, 1988.

Ryabova N. Kievskie rechi. In: Katanyan V. V. (ed.). Sovremennitsy o Mayakovskom. Moscow, Druzhba narodov Publ., 1993, pp. 223–229. (in Russ.)

Schahadat S. Das leben zur kunst machen: lebenskunst in Russland vom 16. bis zum 20. Jahrhundent. Mtinchen: Wilhelm Fink Verlag, 2005.

Searle J. What is a speech act? In: M. Black (ed.). Philosophy in America. London, Alien and Unwin, 1965, pp. 221–239.

Shalamov V. Vospominaniya. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2001. (in Russ.)

Shapir M. Esteticheskiy opyt XX veka: avagard i postmodernism. Filologica, 1995, no. 2, pp. 135–143. (in Russ.)

Sheshukov S. I. Neistovye revniteli: Iz istorii literaturnoy bor’by. Moscow, Moskovskiy rabochiy Publ., 1970. (in Russ.)

Slavinsky V. Poslednee vystuplenie. In: Bykov L. (ed.). Moi Mayakovsky. Ekaterinburg, Ufaktoriya Publ., pp. 351–359. (in Russ.)

Stites R. Revolutionary dreams: Utopian vision and social experiment in the Russian revolution. Oxford, Oxford Uni. Press, 1989.

Szabo Z. G. (ed.). Semantics vs pragmatics. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 2005.

Vanderveken D., Susumu K. (eds.). Essays in speech act theory. Amsterdam, J. Benjamins, 2002.

Weinert R. (ed.). Spoken language pragmatics: An analysis of form-function relations. London, Continuum, 2007.

Weststeijn W. Towards a cognitive theory of character. In: Fleishman L., Golz C., Hansen-Love A. A. (eds.). Analysieren als Deuten: Wolf Schmid zum 60 Geburtstag. Hamburg, Hamburg Uni. Press, 2004, pp. 53–65.

Young J. E. The Texture of Memory. New Haven, Yale Uni. Press, 1993.

Zhirmunsky V. M. Anna Akhmatova i Aleksandr Blok. In: Zhirmunsky V. M. Teoriya literatury. Poetika. Stilistika. Leningrad, Nauka, 1977, pp. 323–354. (in Russ.)

Institute of Philology
Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation
+7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru
© Institute of Philology