|
||||||||
Critique and Semiotics
Digital network scientific journal for specialists in philology and semiotics |
DOI: 10.25205/2307-1737 Roskomnadzor certificate number Эл № ФС 77-84784 | |
Kritika i Semiotika (Critique and Semiotics) | |
|
ArticleName: The Negative Semiosis of Abhidharma and Self-Negation of Human Authors: Sergey S. Avanesov Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russian Federation
Abstract: The anthropological heritage of world philosophy, including its eastern branch, can become one of the conceptual foundations for the humanitarian expertise of modern technological progress. The article analyzes the anthropological concept, which was formulated within the framework of the Buddhist Abhidharma tradition. The author shows how this concept raises and resolves issues that are characteristic of the modern era of “digitalization” of a person. It was found that the theory of the elements of the life stream, to which the personality is reduced, follows from the idea of the coincidence of the world and individual experience. At the same time, the connection of biographical events is provided not by ethical constants and guidelines, but by the automatic action of impersonal karma. It is shown that the images of being and the elements that produce these images are described in Buddhism as signs with zero reference. The stream of life as a negative semiosis opens up a place for the emptiness of non-existence – the inevitable finale of the process of consistent depersonalization of human existence. Thus, a program fixed in tradition is revealed that reveals the an-thropological consequences of digitalization. These consequences consist in the absolute self-negation of human. Keywords: philosophical anthropology, digitalization, Buddhism, Abhidharma, negative semiosis, depersonalization Bibliography: Avanesov S. S. Avtonomiya voli: Kant i Shopengauer o bestsel'nosti nravstvennogo deystviya [Autonomy of the will: Kant and Schopenhauer on the aimlessness of moral action]. Ethical Thought, 2014, vol. 14, pp. 148–159. (in Russ.) Baudrillard J. La société de consommation: ses mythes et ses structures. Transl. into Russian by E. A. Samarskaya. Moscow, 2006, 270 p. (in Russ.) Baudrillard J. Mots de passe. D’un fragment l’autre. Transl. into Russian by N. Suslova. Ekaterinburg, 2006, 200 p. (in Russ.) Bongard-Levin G. M., Ilin G. F. Indiya v drevnosti [India in ancient times]. Moscow, 1985, 758 p. (in Russ.) Certeau M. de. Marches dans la ville. Transl. into Russian by A. A. Kosmarskiy. Russian Sociological Review, 2008, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 24–38. (in Russ.) Grintser P. A. Velikiy epos Indii [The Great Epic of India]. In: Mahābhārata. Rāmāyana. Moscow, 1974, pp. 5–22. (in Russ.) Heidegger M. Was ist das – die Philosophie? Transl. into Russian by E. V. Oznobkina. Voprosy filosofii, 1993, vol. 8, pp. 113–123. (in Russ.) Hume D. Sochineniya [Works]. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 1996, vol. 1, 734 p. (in Russ.) Lepekhov S. Yu. Sravnitel'nyy analiz traditsiy Abhidharmy i prajñāpāramity [Comparative analysis of Abhidharma and Prajñāpāramitā traditions]. In: Filosofskie i sotsial'nye aspekty buddizma [Philosophical and social aspects of Buddhism]. Moscow, 1989, pp. 65–81. (in Russ.) Lepekhov S. Yu. Idei shun'yavady v korotkikh sutrakh prajñāpāramity [Śūnyavāda ideas in the short Prajñāpāramitā sutras]. In: Psikhologicheskie aspekty buddizma [Psychological aspects of Buddhism]. Novosibirsk, 1991, pp. 90–104. (in Russ.) Losev A. F. Filosofiya. Mifologiya. Kul'tura [Philosophy. Mythology. Culture]. Moscow, 1991, 526 p. (in Russ.) Lysenko V. G. Vasubandkhu o real'nosti tol'ko myslennogo predstavleniya (reprezentatsii). Predislovie k publikatsii “Vimshatika-karika-vritti” Vasubandkhu [Vasubandhu about the reality of only a mental representation. Preface to the publication of Vimshatika-karika-vritti by Vasubandhu]. Voprosy filosofii, 2008, vol. 1, pp. 109–112. (in Russ.) Lysenko V. G. Atomisticheskiy podkhod v shkolakh buddiyskoy Abhidharmy: dkharmy i atomy [Atomistic approach in Buddhist Abhidharma schools: atoms and dharmas]. Voprosy filosofii, 2016, vol. 8, pp. 150–165. (in Russ.) Melikov V. V. Ponyatie “sub"ekt” traditsionnogo indiyskogo obshchestva [The concept of “subject” of traditional Indian society]. In: Bog – chelovek – obshchestvo v traditsionnykh kul'turakh Vostoka [God – man – society in the traditional cultures of the East]. Moscow, 1993, pp. 86–105. (in Russ.) Mäll L. Dkharma – tekst i tekstoporozhdayushchiy mekhanizm [Dharma – text and text-generating mechanism]. In: Uchenye zapiski Tartuskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Iss. 754: Trudy po znakovym sistemam (XXI) [Scientific Notes of the Tartu State University. Iss. 754: Sign Systems Studies]. Tartu, 1987, pp. 10–21. (in Russ.) Narinyani A. S. Mezhdu evolyutsiey i sverkhvysokimi tekhnologiyami: novyy chelovek blizhayshego budushchego [Between evolution and ultra-high technology: The new man of the near future]. Voprosy filosofii, 2008, vol. 4, pp. 3–17. (in Russ.) Nietzsche F. Also sprach Zarathustra. Ein Buch für Alle und Keinen. Transl. into Russian. In: Nietzsche F. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow, 1990, vol. 2, pp. 5–237. (in Russ.) Paribok A. V. “Voprosy Milindy” i ikh mesto v istorii buddiyskoy mysli [“Questions of Milinda” and their place in the history of Buddhist thought]. In: Milinda Pañha (Questions of Milinda). Moscow, 1989, pp. 8–62. (in Russ.) Plato. Sochineniya [Works]. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 1970, vol. 2, 610 p. (in Russ.) Rudoy V. I. K rekonstruktsii matrik (chislovykh spiskov) Abhidharmy [To the reconstruction of matrices (numerical lists) of the Abhidharma]. In: Istoriya i kul'tura Tsentral'noy Azii [History and culture of Central Asia]. Moscow, 1983, pp. 190–204. (in Russ.) Russell B. The problems of philosophy. New York, London, 1912, 278 p. Sementsov V. S. K proiskhozhdeniyu termina dhamma / dharma v buddizme tkheravady [To the origin of the term dhamma / dharma in Theravada Buddhism]. In: Filosofskie i sotsial'nye aspekty buddizma [Philosophical and social aspects of Buddhism]. Moscow, 1989, pp. 61–65. (in Russ.) Semichov B. V. O chisle elementov po razlichnym paliyskim i ti-betskim buddiyskim tekstam [On the number of elements according to various Pali and Tibetan Buddhist texts]. In: Trudy Buryatskogo kompleksnogo nauchno-issledovatel'skogo instituta [Proceedings of the Buryat Complex Research Institute]. Ulan-Ude, 1960, iss. 3, pp. 58–68. (in Russ.) Toporov V. N. Dhammapada i buddiyskaya literatura [Dhammapada and Buddhist literature]. In: Dhammapada. Moscow, 1960, pp. 5–55. (in Russ.) Torchinov E. A. O psikhologicheskikh aspektakh ucheniya Prajñāpāramity (na primere “Vajracchedikā-Prajñāpāramitā-sutry”) [On the psychological aspects of the Prajñāpāramitā doctrine (on the Example of the “Vajracchedikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra”)]. In: Psikhologicheskie aspekty buddizma [Psychological aspects of Buddhism]. Novosibirsk, 1986, pp. 47–69. (in Russ.) Shcherbatskoy F. I. Izbrannye trudy po buddizmu [Selected works on Buddhism]. Moscow, 1988, 426 p. (in Russ.) Shokhin V. K. Teizm, postmodernistskie pokhorony metafiziki i indiyskaya anatmavada [Theism, postmodern funeral of metaphysics and Indian anatmavada]. In: Philosophy of Religion: Almanac. 2008–2009. Moscow, 2010, pp. 243–257. (in Russ.) Speshilova E. I. Logiko-ontologicheskie problemy referentsii pustykh terminov: versiya B. Rassela [Logical and Ontological Problems of “Empty” Terms Reference’s: Version by B. Russell]. Tomsk State Pedagogical University Bulletin, 2013, no. 9 (137), pp. 268–272. (in Russ.) Zhukovskaya N. L., Ignatovich A. N., Kornev V. I. Buddizm [Buddhism]. Moscow, 1992, 288 p. (in Russ.) |
Institute of Philology Nikolaeva st., 8, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russian Federation +7-383-330-15-18, ifl@philology.nsc.ru |
© Institute of Philology |